From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:54809)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <peter.maydell@linaro.org>) id 1QI8IL-00031q-Sp
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 May 2011 19:49:22 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <peter.maydell@linaro.org>) id 1QI8IL-000795-0T
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 May 2011 19:49:21 -0400
Received: from mail-iw0-f173.google.com ([209.85.214.173]:58152)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <peter.maydell@linaro.org>) id 1QI8IK-000791-Sd
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 May 2011 19:49:20 -0400
Received: by iwl42 with SMTP id 42so2611862iwl.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 05 May 2011 16:49:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4DC330A4.5020304@landley.net>
References: <BANLkTinC8s20N3=Dk_=7vrXOfjtZyFRO=w@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTikinZr+xHvR0kNPtmeZAYiF-ObxGw@mail.gmail.com>
	<4DC1DE39.8050309@landley.net>
	<BANLkTinCyyGkbAMzXY4-wQzL+5A9SiGnuA@mail.gmail.com>
	<4DC3211B.7040009@landley.net>
	<BANLkTikDz9pNM+oFbOQEpE0chvoCQTe_nQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<4DC330A4.5020304@landley.net>
Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 00:49:19 +0100
Message-ID: <BANLkTinHHYfDQXDQpoFQH61MuFmkWb_Y=g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] A Question
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
Cc: zhangzhenkai@gmail.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On 6 May 2011 00:20, Rob Landley <rob@landley.net> wrote:
> On 05/05/2011 05:32 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> (ARM kernels having alas not yet got to the point where you
>> can build a single kernel that will boot on everything.)
>
> Grant Likely's working on making it happen via device trees. Here's my
> bookmark out of my todo list on the current status of using qemu

Yes. Making sure ARM QEMU plays nicely with device tree is on
Linaro's todo list for the upcoming six-month cycle.

-- PMM