From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:41311) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QWqDm-0005js-C4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:33:30 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QWqDk-0007xT-H5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:33:26 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-f45.google.com ([209.85.213.45]:40057) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QWqDj-0007xC-Lh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:33:24 -0400 Received: by ywl41 with SMTP id 41so301446ywl.4 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 06:33:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1307544625-22907-1-git-send-email-konishchev@gmail.com> <20110613082608.GA25582@stefanha-thinkpad.localdomain> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:33:22 +0100 Message-ID: From: Stefan Hajnoczi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] CPU consumption optimization of 'qemu-img convert' using bdrv_is_allocated() List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Dmitry Konishchev Cc: Kevin Wolf , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Dmitry Konishchev w= rote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wro= te: >> We need to fully understand performance before applying optimizations >> on top. =A0Otherwise it is possible to paper over a problem while >> leaving the root cause unsolved. =A0Avoiding lseek(2) is very important, >> not just for qemu-img but also for running VMs. =A0lseek(2) should only >> be invoked if the image is growable/removable. >> >> When I run a VM from a virtio-blk raw image I see no lseek(2) calls. >> >> On the host: >> strace -p $pid_of_qemu -f >> >> Inside the guest: >> dd if=3D/dev/vda of=3D/dev/null iflag=3Ddirect >> >> I see pread(2) from the posix-aio-compat.c worker threads but no >> lseek(2). =A0The total_sectors cached value is being used. >> >> Does strace(1) show lseek(2) on your host? > > No, I don't see lseek() in the strace output. But in the other hand I > see that bdrv_get_geometry() uses bdrv_getlength() which is > implemented using lseek() in block/raw-posix.c... > May be I'am mistaken about lseek(), but I get 9% slower version if > disable caching. "disable caching"? Stefan