From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:51765) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QFWb0-0002zE-HJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 15:09:51 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QFWaz-0008Co-G1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 15:09:50 -0400 Received: from mail-qy0-f180.google.com ([209.85.216.180]:52336) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QFWaz-0008CZ-Dq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 15:09:49 -0400 Received: by qyk10 with SMTP id 10so1738554qyk.4 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 12:09:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: From: Blue Swirl Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 22:09:25 +0300 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU testing methodology & results List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Roberto Paleari Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Roberto Paleari wrote: > Hi Stefan, > > Not yet. I have not received any reply besides Blue Swirl's message.. Therefore, please publish the problems you found on this list so we can start fixing them.