qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Felix Oxley <felix@oxley.org>
To: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU suitable for mission critical applications?
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 10:00:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTinnh8Lmdvy==yw72Xj6B+isnMGz7g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTina9HXkpnWQJVnqAaMq+dXbwCdZkQ@mail.gmail.com>

Thank you all for your responses.
It appears that it would be wise to continue to maintain Sun hardware.

On 12 June 2011 22:51, Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Felix Oxley <felix@oxley.org> wrote:
>>> I have a an (almost) EOL factory planning system running on Solaris
>>> Sparc which I would like to move to intel (and preferably virtualise)
>>> in order to avoid having to maintain the Sun system and backup system.
>>> The text based cobol application runs on this system: SunOS gplan 5.9
>>> Generic_118558-35 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Blade-1500. It is not feasible
>>> to recompile the application to x86.
>>>
>>> Therefore I am looking for alternative solutions. I heard of
>>> Transitive QuickTransit, however since being purchased by IBM I do not
>>> believe this is being marketed.
>>
>> Right.
>>
>>> Would QEMU be suitable for this task? Would I be able to get commercial support?
>>
>> I think it will be difficult to get commerical support for QEMU SPARC.
>>  How well QEMU runs sun4u I'm not sure.
>
> Not very well yet. For running a single application, it could be
> possible to develop a Solaris user emulator to run only the
> applications under x86 Solaris.
>
>> Personally, I would leave it running untouched since there isn't a
>> low-risk solution.  Perhaps others on the list have more information
>> but I wanted to reply in case no one else does so you'll at least have
>> something to go by.
>
> Used Sparc hardware is not very expensive either.
>

      reply	other threads:[~2011-06-13  9:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-08 10:08 [Qemu-devel] QEMU suitable for mission critical applications? Felix Oxley
2011-06-08 11:19 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-06-12 21:51   ` Blue Swirl
2011-06-13  9:00     ` Felix Oxley [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='BANLkTinnh8Lmdvy==yw72Xj6B+isnMGz7g@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=felix@oxley.org \
    --cc=blauwirbel@gmail.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).