From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:45193) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QLmfP-0007Ba-Vg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 15 May 2011 21:32:16 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QLmfP-0007t5-4n for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 15 May 2011 21:32:15 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f45.google.com ([209.85.214.45]:56927) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QLmfO-0007sz-VD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 15 May 2011 21:32:15 -0400 Received: by bwz16 with SMTP id 16so3720420bwz.4 for ; Sun, 15 May 2011 18:32:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20110515201727.GB29768@redhat.com> References: <1303477168-4663-1-git-send-email-pclouds@gmail.com> <20110515201727.GB29768@redhat.com> From: Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 08:31:43 +0700 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] net/socket: remove hardcoded packet size in favor of new mtu parameter List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi , Anthony Liguori , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Mark McLoughlin 2011/5/16 Michael S. Tsirkin : > On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 07:59:28PM +0700, Nguy=E1=BB=85n Th=C3=A1i Ng=E1= =BB=8Dc Duy wrote: >> Also mention the default value 4096. >> >> Signed-off-by: Nguy=E1=BB=85n Th=C3=A1i Ng=E1=BB=8Dc Duy > > IS the option really necessary? Why not just allocate 128K or so and be > done with it? That should be big enough even with GSO etc. If it's big enough for practically everything, then yes, that way would be simpler. --=20 Duy