From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:49081) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QV58F-0000CW-0L for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 13:04:28 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QV58D-0001np-15 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 13:04:26 -0400 Received: from mail-px0-f174.google.com ([209.85.212.174]:42209) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QV58C-0001nk-I7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 13:04:24 -0400 Received: by pxi15 with SMTP id 15so1947077pxi.33 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 10:04:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <40cc2aebc5a57aced2bd09c3b3da8dde58f8a707.1307014902.git.quintela@redhat.com> References: <40cc2aebc5a57aced2bd09c3b3da8dde58f8a707.1307014902.git.quintela@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 18:04:23 +0100 Message-ID: From: Peter Maydell Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 05/14] linuxload: id_change was a write only variable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Juan Quintela Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 2 June 2011 12:53, Juan Quintela wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell It does seem a bit odd that we were carefully calculating this flag and then ignoring it, but I guess we just have to treat the reason as lost in the mists of time (as you say, according to the git history it has always been this way..) -- PMM