From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:59223) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QMOrx-0005f4-Kb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 May 2011 14:19:46 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QMOrw-0001H4-Fg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 May 2011 14:19:45 -0400 Received: from mail-iw0-f173.google.com ([209.85.214.173]:41159) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QMOrw-0001GT-Ck for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 May 2011 14:19:44 -0400 Received: by iwl42 with SMTP id 42so757749iwl.4 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 11:19:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1304686095-30265-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org> References: <1304686095-30265-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org> Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 19:19:42 +0100 Message-ID: From: Peter Maydell Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] target-arm: Fix bugs in fp exception flag setting List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: patches@linaro.org On 6 May 2011 13:48, Peter Maydell wrote: > This patch series fixes a number of minor bugs in the ARM target where > we were not correctly setting the cumulative exception flags in the > FPSCR. It includes adding a new flag to softfloat indicating when a > denormal result has been flushed to zero (as discussed previously on > the list.) > Peter Maydell (7): > =C2=A0target-arm: Don't set FP exceptions in recip, recip_sqrt estimate f= ns > =C2=A0target-arm: Signal InputDenormal for VRECPE, VRSQRTE, VRECPS, VRSQR= TS > =C2=A0target-arm: Signal InvalidOp for Neon GE and GT compares of QNaN > =C2=A0target-arm: Refactor int-float conversions > =C2=A0target-arm: Add separate Neon float-int conversion helpers > =C2=A0softfloat: Add new flag for when denormal result is flushed to zero > =C2=A0target-arm: Signal Underflow when denormal flushed to zero on outpu= t I'm redoing patches 4 and 5 based on review comments; does anybody have any comments on 1,2,3,6,7 ? (if not then they could all be applied now, I guess -- 6 and 7 don't depend on 4 and 5. otherwise I'll put them all into my resend as-is.) thanks -- PMM