From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IxPaO-0005bX-Gp
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 11:16:28 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IxPaH-0005Yg-QF
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 11:16:28 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IxPaH-0005YX-KI
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 11:16:21 -0500
Received: from bay0-omc2-s11.bay0.hotmail.com ([65.54.246.147])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <computers57@hotmail.com>) id 1IxPaH-0008Tp-AX
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 11:16:22 -0500
Message-ID: <BAY133-DAV2D882EB19338F5E6161A6B9770@phx.gbl>
From: "Hotmail" <computers57@hotmail.com>
References: <BAY133-DAV29F8DEB7D6C2BAE30DA3DB9760@phx.gbl>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0711281247010.27959@racer.site>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] another patch against head
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 09:16:12 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Cc: qemu Devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>


----- Original Message -----=20
From: "Johannes Schindelin" <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
To: "Hotmail" <computers57@hotmail.com>
Cc: "qemu Devel" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 5:49 AM
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] another patch against head


> Hi Hotmail,
>=20
Hello.  Please call me C.W.
> ...
> > (patch to cocoa.m)
> How does this help compiling on Windows?
It doesn't.  It's just a little patch should someone decide to build it =
on cocoa and are confused
>=20
> > (patch against monitor.c and hw/adlib.c)
> Why are these needed?  It appears that all other platforms build QEmu =
just=20
> fine without these #includes.
I also seem to have this problem on my Linux box.  It could be my cvs =
files has become disjoined from the server, or both compilers somehow =
don't include the needed headers elsewhere in the code.
> But then, the answer to that riddle could be in the context.  Since =
you=20
> did not use the unified diff format, I have no chance to know.
How would I make a unified diff from a command line?