Re: [PATCH v5 00/14] tpm: introduce TPM CRB SysBus device

[Joelle van Dyne <j@getutm.app>]

On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 1:38 AM Marc-André Lureau
<marcandre.lureau@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 6:10 AM Joelle van Dyne <j@getutm.app> wrote:
> >
> > The impetus for this patch set is to get TPM 2.0 working on Windows 11 ARM64.
> > Windows' tpm.sys does not seem to work on a TPM TIS device (as verified with
> > VMWare's implementation). However, the current TPM CRB device uses a fixed
> > system bus address that is reserved for RAM in ARM64 Virt machines.
> >
> > In the process of adding the TPM CRB SysBus device, we also went ahead and
> > cleaned up some of the existing TPM hardware code and fixed some bugs. We used
> > the TPM TIS devices as a template for the TPM CRB devices and refactored out
> > common code. We moved the ACPI DSDT generation to the device in order to handle
> > dynamic base address requirements as well as reduce redundent code in different
> > machine ACPI generation. We also changed the tpm_crb device to use the ISA bus
> > instead of depending on the default system bus as the device only was built for
> > the PC configuration.
> >
> > Another change is that the TPM CRB registers are now mapped in the same way that
> > the pflash ROM devices are mapped. It is a memory region whose writes are
> > trapped as MMIO accesses. This was needed because Apple Silicon does not decode
> > LDP (AARCH64 load pair of registers) caused page faults. @agraf suggested that
> > we do this to avoid having to do AARCH64 decoding in the HVF backend's fault
> > handler.
> >
> > Unfortunately, it seems like the LDP fault still happens on HVF but the issue
> > seems to be in the HVF backend which needs to be fixed in a separate patch.
> >
> > One last thing that's needed to get Windows 11 to recognize the TPM 2.0 device
> > is for the OVMF firmware to setup the TPM device. Currently, OVMF for ARM64 Virt
> > only recognizes the TPM TIS device through a FDT entry. A workaround is to
> > falsely identify the TPM CRB device as a TPM TIS device in the FDT node but this
> > causes issues for Linux. A proper fix would involve adding an ACPI device driver
> > in OVMF.
> >
> > This has been tested on ARM64 with `tpm-crb-device` and on x86_64 with
> > `tpm-crb`. Additional testing should be performed on other architectures (RISCV
> > and Loongarch for example) as well as migration cases.
> >
> > v5:
> > - Fixed a typo in "tpm_crb: use a single read-as-mem/write-as-mmio mapping"
> > - Fixed ACPI tables not being created for pc CRB device
> >
> > v4:
> > - Fixed broken test blobs
> >
> > v3:
> > - Support backwards and forwards migration of existing tpm-crb device
> > - Dropped patch which moved tpm-crb to ISA bus due to migration concerns
> > - Unified `tpm_sysbus_plug` handler for ARM and Loongarch
> > - Added ACPI table tests for tpm-crb-device
> > - Refactored TPM CRB tests to run on tpm-crb-device for ARM Virt
> >
> > v2:
> > - Fixed an issue where VMstate restore from an older version failed due to name
> >   collision of the memory block.
> > - In the ACPI table generation for CRB devices, the check for TPM 2.0 backend is
> >   moved to the device realize as CRB does not support TPM 1.0. It will error in
> >   that case.
> > - Dropped the patch to fix crash when PPI is enabled on TIS SysBus device since
> >   a separate patch submitted by Stefan Berger disables such an option.
> > - Fixed an issue where we default tpmEstablished=0 when it should be 1.
> > - In TPM CRB SysBus's ACPI entry, we accidently changed _UID from 0 to 1. This
> >   shouldn't be an issue but we changed it back just in case.
> > - Added a patch to migrate saved VMstate from an older version with the regs
> >   saved separately instead of as a RAM block.
> >
> > Joelle van Dyne (14):
> >   tpm_crb: refactor common code
> >   tpm_crb: CTRL_RSP_ADDR is 64-bits wide
> >   tpm_ppi: refactor memory space initialization
> >   tpm_crb: use a single read-as-mem/write-as-mmio mapping
> >   tpm_crb: move ACPI table building to device interface
> >   tpm-sysbus: add plug handler for TPM on SysBus
> >   hw/arm/virt: connect TPM to platform bus
> >   hw/loongarch/virt: connect TPM to platform bus
> >   tpm_tis_sysbus: move DSDT AML generation to device
> >   tests: acpi: prepare for TPM CRB tests
> >   tpm_crb_sysbus: introduce TPM CRB SysBus device
> >   tests: acpi: implement TPM CRB tests for ARM virt
> >   tests: acpi: updated expected blobs for TPM CRB
> >   tests: add TPM-CRB sysbus tests for aarch64
>
> The series looks good to me.
> Have you checked there are no regressions with Windows HLK?
I don't have any experience with Windows HLK. Is there any guide on
running it with QEMU? Preferably with a prebuilt image? Or maybe
someone in the mailing list can run it?

>
> thanks
>
> >
> >  docs/specs/tpm.rst                        |   2 +
> >  hw/tpm/tpm_crb.h                          |  79 ++++++
> >  hw/tpm/tpm_ppi.h                          |  10 +-
> >  include/hw/acpi/tpm.h                     |   3 +-
> >  include/sysemu/tpm.h                      |   7 +
> >  tests/qtest/tpm-tests.h                   |   2 +
> >  tests/qtest/tpm-util.h                    |   4 +-
> >  hw/acpi/aml-build.c                       |   7 +-
> >  hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c                  |  38 +--
> >  hw/arm/virt.c                             |   8 +
> >  hw/core/sysbus-fdt.c                      |   1 +
> >  hw/i386/acpi-build.c                      |  16 +-
> >  hw/loongarch/acpi-build.c                 |  38 +--
> >  hw/loongarch/virt.c                       |   8 +
> >  hw/riscv/virt.c                           |   1 +
> >  hw/tpm/tpm-sysbus.c                       |  47 ++++
> >  hw/tpm/tpm_crb.c                          | 302 ++++++----------------
> >  hw/tpm/tpm_crb_common.c                   | 262 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  hw/tpm/tpm_crb_sysbus.c                   | 162 ++++++++++++
> >  hw/tpm/tpm_ppi.c                          |   5 +-
> >  hw/tpm/tpm_tis_isa.c                      |   5 +-
> >  hw/tpm/tpm_tis_sysbus.c                   |  37 +++
> >  tests/qtest/bios-tables-test.c            |  47 +++-
> >  tests/qtest/tpm-crb-device-swtpm-test.c   |  72 ++++++
> >  tests/qtest/tpm-crb-device-test.c         |  71 +++++
> >  tests/qtest/tpm-crb-swtpm-test.c          |   2 +
> >  tests/qtest/tpm-crb-test.c                | 121 +--------
> >  tests/qtest/tpm-tests.c                   | 121 +++++++++
> >  tests/qtest/tpm-tis-device-swtpm-test.c   |   2 +-
> >  tests/qtest/tpm-tis-device-test.c         |   2 +-
> >  tests/qtest/tpm-tis-i2c-test.c            |   3 +
> >  tests/qtest/tpm-tis-swtpm-test.c          |   2 +-
> >  tests/qtest/tpm-tis-test.c                |   2 +-
> >  tests/qtest/tpm-util.c                    |  16 +-
> >  hw/arm/Kconfig                            |   1 +
> >  hw/loongarch/Kconfig                      |   2 +
> >  hw/riscv/Kconfig                          |   1 +
> >  hw/tpm/Kconfig                            |   5 +
> >  hw/tpm/meson.build                        |   5 +
> >  hw/tpm/trace-events                       |   2 +-
> >  tests/data/acpi/q35/DSDT.crb.tpm2         | Bin 0 -> 8355 bytes
> >  tests/data/acpi/q35/TPM2.crb.tpm2         | Bin 0 -> 76 bytes
> >  tests/data/acpi/virt/DSDT.crb-device.tpm2 | Bin 0 -> 5276 bytes
> >  tests/data/acpi/virt/TPM2.crb-device.tpm2 | Bin 0 -> 76 bytes
> >  tests/qtest/meson.build                   |   4 +
> >  45 files changed, 1057 insertions(+), 468 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 hw/tpm/tpm_crb.h
> >  create mode 100644 hw/tpm/tpm-sysbus.c
> >  create mode 100644 hw/tpm/tpm_crb_common.c
> >  create mode 100644 hw/tpm/tpm_crb_sysbus.c
> >  create mode 100644 tests/qtest/tpm-crb-device-swtpm-test.c
> >  create mode 100644 tests/qtest/tpm-crb-device-test.c
> >  create mode 100644 tests/data/acpi/q35/DSDT.crb.tpm2
> >  create mode 100644 tests/data/acpi/q35/TPM2.crb.tpm2
> >  create mode 100644 tests/data/acpi/virt/DSDT.crb-device.tpm2
> >  create mode 100644 tests/data/acpi/virt/TPM2.crb-device.tpm2
> >
> > --
> > 2.41.0
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Marc-André Lureau