From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Paul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com>,
coreyb@linux.vnet.ibm.com, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Eduardo Otubo <otubo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] seccomp submaintainer? (was Re: [PATCH] seccomp: adding times() to the whitelist)
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 11:40:41 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+aC4ktWhrsccrCMsz1anYVwucxPGPDUXuLiPMVBU8pQ6QaoSA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <522DD199.2020508@redhat.com>
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 8:48 AM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
> Il 09/09/2013 15:20, Eduardo Otubo ha scritto:
>>> Out of respect for the work that Eduardo has done, and is
>>> continuing to do, with the QEMU seccomp filtering, I think Eduardo
>>> should be the one to take on this role. If Eduardo declines I'll do
>>> ahead and submit a patch adding myself to the MAINTAINERS file.
>>
>> If this is ok for everyone, I would be really glad to take this role to
>> myself. Paul, thanks for this vote of confidence. Paolo, should I send a
>> patch for MAINTAINERS right away?
>
> Ok, I was suggesting Paul because he was the one doing reviews.
>
> Eduardo, that is also okay for me. However, even as a maintainer please
> do wait for Paul's reviews. Many areas of QEMU have maintainers that do
> not send their own patches without a review, so this wouldn't be a new
> rule. :)
>
> Please wait for Anthony's ack. I changed the subject and CCed him to
> grab his attention.
Ack. I think it's a great idea.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
>
> Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-09 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-04 12:25 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] seccomp: adding times() to the whitelist Eduardo Otubo
2013-09-04 13:10 ` Corey Bryant
2013-09-04 14:11 ` Paul Moore
2013-09-06 18:41 ` Eduardo Otubo
2013-09-09 10:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-09-09 12:36 ` Paul Moore
2013-09-09 13:20 ` Eduardo Otubo
2013-09-09 13:48 ` [Qemu-devel] seccomp submaintainer? (was Re: [PATCH] seccomp: adding times() to the whitelist) Paolo Bonzini
2013-09-09 14:44 ` Paul Moore
2013-09-09 16:40 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2013-09-13 14:45 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] seccomp: adding times() to the whitelist Paul Moore
2013-09-23 19:49 ` Eduardo Otubo
2013-09-23 19:54 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-09-23 19:53 ` Paul Moore
2013-09-23 19:56 ` Eduardo Otubo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CA+aC4ktWhrsccrCMsz1anYVwucxPGPDUXuLiPMVBU8pQ6QaoSA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=coreyb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=otubo@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pmoore@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).