From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37636) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ceNwq-0003k1-5O for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 10:26:21 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ceNwl-0004fd-TV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 10:26:20 -0500 Received: from mail-lf0-f52.google.com ([209.85.215.52]:36365) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ceNwl-0004eW-Li for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 10:26:15 -0500 Received: by mail-lf0-f52.google.com with SMTP id z134so9766883lff.3 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 07:26:15 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: dillaman@redhat.com In-Reply-To: <887093105.8854266.1487258021988.JavaMail.zimbra@oxygem.tv> References: <20170216084318.11122-1-jazeltq@gmail.com> <20170216090002.12511-1-jazeltq@gmail.com> <887093105.8854266.1487258021988.JavaMail.zimbra@oxygem.tv> From: Jason Dillaman Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 10:26:13 -0500 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v5] RBD: Add support readv,writev for rbd List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alexandre DERUMIER Cc: jazeltq , Tiger Hu , Josh Durgin , Jeff Cody , Kevin Wolf , Max Reitz , qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel , ceph-devel , tianqing On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:13 AM, Alexandre DERUMIER wrote: > Hi, I would like to bench it with small 4k read/write. > > On the ceph side,do we need this PR ? : > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/13447 Yes, that is the correct PR for the client-side librbd changes. You should be able to test it against Hammer/Jewel-release clusters. -- Jason