From: Sergio Lopez Pascual <slp@redhat.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] vfio: If DMA map returns ENOMEM wait and try again
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 18:07:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAiTLFUhrTPEB2PRLXF=5mmUsQ8B70RQpc82bJBFjvGpmTkTQQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170403094015.57368766@t450s.home>
On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 5:40 PM, Alex Williamson
<alex.williamson@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 3 Apr 2017 10:58:22 +0200
> Sergio Lopez <slp@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > When quickly unmapping and mapping memory regions (as may happen in
> > address_space_update_topology), if running with a non-unlimited
> > RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, the kernel may return ENOMEM for a map request
> > because the previous unmap has been processed, but accounted yet.
> >
> > Probably this should be fixed in the kernel ensuring a deterministic
> > behavior for VFIO map and unmap operations. Until then, this works
> > around the issue, waiting 10ms and trying again.
>
> I think we need to know what that kernel fix is before adding arbitrary
> delays and retries in userspace code (Do we know why 10ms works? Is
> it too long/short?).
AFAIK from userspace we can't know when a certain work scheduled in a
kernel workqueue has been completed. Calling usleep ensures the
process will yield, and 10ms looks enough time for a full world of
context switches, but I agree with you that's pretty arbitrary.
On the other hand, this code is only reached in a pretty exceptional
situation, which is not relevant from a performance point of view, and
there's already a workaround for a non-deterministic EBUSY while
mapping VGA ROM space.
There's the option of leaving this as is, and waiting for a fix in the
kernel, but I think I'd a good idea to work around the issue for older
kernels too.
Sergio.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-03 16:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-03 8:58 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] vfio: If DMA map returns ENOMEM wait and try again Sergio Lopez
2017-04-03 15:40 ` Alex Williamson
2017-04-03 16:07 ` Sergio Lopez Pascual [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAAiTLFUhrTPEB2PRLXF=5mmUsQ8B70RQpc82bJBFjvGpmTkTQQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=slp@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).