From: 吴兴博 <wuxb45@gmail.com>
To: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] disk image: self-organized format or raw file
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 08:03:18 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABPa+v0VbUCTTrgzBAnj4zBysgN0OZjb9hupSrQ1bhHigxC4-Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140812113916.GB2803@T430.redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1197 bytes --]
I carefully read your reply and thought of it carefully. I'm sorry that
when I said "I get it" I actually meant "I believe you" but not "I
understand it".
The problem would not come from cp or rsync -- It's not their fault. They
just have no way to make it right.
The real reason of it would be that filesystems have different allocation
unit size.
For example, a file is of 16KB in appearance, and the 4KB-12KB of it is a
hole (0KB-4KB and 12KB-16KB has valid data).
The FS held it has 4KB block size, so it *could* be allocated like this.
Copying this file to a filesystem of 16KB block size would cause the entire
16KB filled with data, to be specific, the hole is filled with zero and
cp/rsync have NO way to make difference.
That's not a engineering issue of cp/rsync. It's a real issue cause by the
fact that (most) filesystems have configurable block size.
Is that correct?
I really appreciate.
Cheers!
吴兴博 Wu, Xingbo <wuxb45@gmail.com>
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 7:39 AM, Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 08/12 07:22, 吴兴博 wrote:
> > Thanks, I get it.
> > Does rsync have exactly the same problem?
>
> Yes.
>
> Fam
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1873 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-12 12:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-11 23:38 [Qemu-devel] disk image: self-organized format or raw file 吴兴博
2014-08-12 0:52 ` Fam Zheng
2014-08-12 10:46 ` 吴兴博
2014-08-12 11:19 ` Fam Zheng
[not found] ` <CABPa+v1a7meoEtjLkwygjuZEABTqd8q3efGWJvAsAr-mLTQb-A@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20140812113916.GB2803@T430.redhat.com>
2014-08-12 12:03 ` 吴兴博 [this message]
2014-08-12 12:21 ` Fam Zheng
2014-08-12 13:08 ` Kirill Batuzov
2014-08-12 13:23 ` Eric Blake
2014-08-12 13:45 ` 吴兴博
2014-08-12 14:07 ` Eric Blake
2014-08-12 14:14 ` 吴兴博
2014-08-12 15:30 ` Eric Blake
2014-08-12 16:22 ` Xingbo Wu
2014-08-13 1:29 ` Fam Zheng
2014-08-13 15:42 ` Kevin Wolf
2014-08-12 18:39 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2014-08-12 18:46 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2014-08-12 18:52 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2014-08-12 19:23 ` Xingbo Wu
2014-08-12 20:14 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2014-08-13 15:54 ` Kevin Wolf
2014-08-13 16:38 ` Xingbo Wu
2014-08-13 18:32 ` Kevin Wolf
2014-08-13 21:04 ` Xingbo Wu
2014-08-13 21:35 ` Eric Blake
2014-08-14 2:42 ` Xingbo Wu
2014-08-14 9:06 ` Kevin Wolf
2014-08-14 20:53 ` Xingbo Wu
2014-08-15 10:46 ` Kevin Wolf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CABPa+v0VbUCTTrgzBAnj4zBysgN0OZjb9hupSrQ1bhHigxC4-Q@mail.gmail.com \
--to=wuxb45@gmail.com \
--cc=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).