From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:34759) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h0pby-0003Yy-BJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2019 10:34:39 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h0pbw-0005mW-St for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2019 10:34:38 -0500 Received: from mail-ot1-x332.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::332]:33559) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h0pbu-0005fp-Rv for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2019 10:34:36 -0500 Received: by mail-ot1-x332.google.com with SMTP id q24so4565025otk.0 for ; Mon, 04 Mar 2019 07:34:34 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190223105421.1290-1-davidkiarie4@gmail.com> <20190223105421.1290-2-davidkiarie4@gmail.com> <105ba509-af60-b47c-51cc-1e1c01fac56e@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: From: David Kiarie Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2019 18:33:45 +0300 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] hw/i386: update copyright notice List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Thomas Huth Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu=2DDaud=C3=A9?= , QEMU Developers , Eduardo Habkost , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Jan Kiszka , Peter Xu , =?UTF-8?Q?Alexandro_S=C3=A1nchez_Bach?= , Paolo Bonzini , Richard Henderson On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 6:32 PM David Kiarie wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 6:27 PM David Kiarie > wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 6:23 PM Thomas Huth wrote: >> >>> On 04/03/2019 16.13, David Kiarie wrote: >>> > >>> > Hi David, >>> > >>> > On 2/23/19 11:54 AM, David Kiarie wrote: >>> > > Signed-off-by: David Kiarie >>> > >> > > >>> > > --- >>> > > hw/i386/amd_iommu.c | 2 +- >>> > > hw/i386/amd_iommu.h | 2 +- >>> > > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 >>> > deletions(-) >>> > > >>> > > diff --git a/hw/i386/amd_iommu.c >>> > b/hw/i386/amd_iommu.c >>> > > index 8ad707a..4f179da 100644 >>> > > --- a/hw/i386/amd_iommu.c >>> > > +++ b/hw/i386/amd_iommu.c >>> > > @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ >>> > > * QEMU emulation of AMD IOMMU (AMD-Vi) >>> > > * >>> > > * Copyright (C) 2011 Eduard - Gabriel >>> > Munteanu >>> > > - * Copyright (C) 2015 David Kiarie, >>> > >> > > >>> > > + * Copyright (C) 2016 David Kiarie >>> Kahurani >>> > >>> > Why do you change the year? Because your >>> > work was merged in 2016? >>> > >>> > >>> > no. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > though, if you have a legitimate issue with the >>> > change, you can always air it. >>> > >>> > >>> > you might think random emails are weird but Paolo, i >>> > don't expect to see any activity from you, on Qemu repo >>> > before this issue is sorted ;-) >>> > >>> > >>> > i mostly don't care about this code but i *wrote* it. if i >>> > am not allowed even make such minor(which i not a routine), >>> > why shouldn't i ask you to take the files down? >>> > >>> > >>> > or, rather, a small issue turns into a scene about how clean >>> > Qemu is. why not take down all my dirty code? >>> > >>> > >>> > look i'm resending this patch and next time we're having this >>> > conversation, i'll be defacing qemu. >>> > >>> > either you have to update my code to what i think it should look like >>> or >>> > you have to take down - wtf >>> > >>> > then you try to cook rubbish over it. >>> >>> Hey, calm down. Paolo said that he'd queue your patch, so it will >>> eventually get applied. But that just might take some time, the >>> maintainers only send PULL requests for their queued patches after a >>> couple of days. So relax, wait some days, and if your patch still did >>> not get applied in a week, then you can start complaining again. >>> >> >> i'll not complain again, i'm make a patch to clean my code from your >> codebase. >> > > > Qemu have never been important to me like it's important to the > maintainers. > > i'm sure you can write your own AMD IOMMU. > > >> >> >>> >>> Thomas >>> >>