From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32892) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cyYmK-0000iK-Rr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 03:02:54 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cyYmG-0002IK-Ku for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 03:02:52 -0400 Received: from mail-vk0-f41.google.com ([209.85.213.41]:36512) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cyYmG-0002I1-G1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 03:02:48 -0400 Received: by mail-vk0-f41.google.com with SMTP id x65so14157606vkx.3 for ; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 00:02:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8a7bf9dbac4c6db5b7e8dd5c968cacae@ispras.ru> References: <8a7bf9dbac4c6db5b7e8dd5c968cacae@ispras.ru> From: Ladi Prosek Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 09:02:45 +0200 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] WinDbg module List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Mihail Abakumov Cc: qemu-devel , sw@weilnetz.de, Pavel Dovgalyuk , Paolo Bonzini Hi, On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Mihail Abakumov wrote: > Hello. > > We made the debugger module WinDbg (like GDB) for QEMU. This is the > replacement of the remote stub in Windows kernel. Used for remote Windows > kernel debugging without debugging mode. This is awesome! > The latest build and instructions for the launch can be found here: > https://github.com/ispras/qemu/releases/tag/v2.7.50-windbg > > Currently only one ways to create a remote debugging connection is > supported: using COM port with named pipe. The linked v2.7.50-windbg seems to be a Windows release. Does it also work on Linux hosts with KVM? Also, #ifdef TARGET_X86_64 // Unimplemented yet #error Unsupported Architecture #endif can you estimate the amount of work to support 64-bit? Thanks! Ladi > Should I prepare patches for inclusion in the master branch? Or is it too > specific module and it is not needed? > > -- > Thanks, > Mihail Abakumov >