From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Cc: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] tests/qtest: bump up QOS_PATH_MAX_ELEMENT_SIZE
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 01:15:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABgObfYjhe7_qTRYMz_eeTCaJekHOBe3WLrx_OnPBfaMRcuMKA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220927213501.4069117-1-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1133 bytes --]
What is an example of one such huge path? This would mean that LTO is
changing the set of tests that are run, which is unexpected.
Paolo
Il mar 27 set 2022, 23:35 Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> ha scritto:
> It seems the depth of path we need to support can vary depending on
> the order of the init constructors getting called. It seems
> --enable-lto shuffles things around just enough to push you over the
> limit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
> Fixes: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/1186
> ---
> tests/qtest/libqos/qgraph.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/qtest/libqos/qgraph.h b/tests/qtest/libqos/qgraph.h
> index 6e94824d09..5c0046e989 100644
> --- a/tests/qtest/libqos/qgraph.h
> +++ b/tests/qtest/libqos/qgraph.h
> @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
> #include "libqos-malloc.h"
>
> /* maximum path length */
> -#define QOS_PATH_MAX_ELEMENT_SIZE 50
> +#define QOS_PATH_MAX_ELEMENT_SIZE 64
>
> typedef struct QOSGraphObject QOSGraphObject;
> typedef struct QOSGraphNode QOSGraphNode;
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1701 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-27 23:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-27 21:35 [RFC PATCH] tests/qtest: bump up QOS_PATH_MAX_ELEMENT_SIZE Alex Bennée
2022-09-27 23:15 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2022-09-28 8:44 ` Alex Bennée
2022-09-28 22:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-09-28 22:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-09-29 6:58 ` Thomas Huth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CABgObfYjhe7_qTRYMz_eeTCaJekHOBe3WLrx_OnPBfaMRcuMKA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).