Re: [PATCH 3/3] semihosting: Restrict to TCG

[Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>]

On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 5:56 PM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
<philmd@linaro.org> wrote:
> It is pointless to build semihosting when TCG is not available.

Why? I would have naively assumed that a suitable semihosting API
could be implemented by KVM. The justification (and thus the commit
message) needs to be different for each architecture if it's a matter
of instruction set or insufficient KVM userspace API.

Paolo

> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
> ---
>  semihosting/Kconfig | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/semihosting/Kconfig b/semihosting/Kconfig
> index eaf3a20ef5..fbe6ac87f9 100644
> --- a/semihosting/Kconfig
> +++ b/semihosting/Kconfig
> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
>
>  config SEMIHOSTING
>         bool
> +       depends on TCG
>
>  config ARM_COMPATIBLE_SEMIHOSTING
>         bool
> --
> 2.41.0
>