qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: "Wolf, Kevin" <kwolf@redhat.com>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] qom: move user_creatable_add_opts logic to vl.c and QAPIfy it
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 11:05:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABgObfZbaqiEeNcm7XrEMAgAzp8_xrROFof3VuUKsfK1CCeTdA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87im5vv0j4.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2466 bytes --]

I will use ObjectOptionsQueue like the typedef just above.

Paolo


Il sab 13 mar 2021, 10:57 Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> ha scritto:

> One more little thing...
>
> Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> writes:
>
> > Emulators are currently using OptsVisitor (via user_creatable_add_opts)
> > to parse the -object command line option.  This has one extra feature,
> > compared to keyval, which is automatic conversion of integers to lists
> > as well as support for lists as repeated options:
> >
> >   -object
> memory-backend-ram,id=pc.ram,size=1048576000,host-nodes=0,policy=bind
> >
> > So we cannot replace OptsVisitor with keyval right now.  Still, this
> > patch moves the user_creatable_add_opts logic to vl.c since it is
> > not needed anywhere else, and makes it go through
> user_creatable_add_qapi.
> >
> > In order to minimize code changes, the predicate still takes a string.
> > This can be changed later to use the ObjectType QAPI enum directly.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> [...]
> > diff --git a/softmmu/vl.c b/softmmu/vl.c
> > index ff488ea3e7..b245e912e5 100644
> > --- a/softmmu/vl.c
> > +++ b/softmmu/vl.c
> > @@ -117,6 +117,7 @@
> >  #include "qapi/qapi-commands-block-core.h"
> >  #include "qapi/qapi-commands-migration.h"
> >  #include "qapi/qapi-commands-misc.h"
> > +#include "qapi/qapi-visit-qom.h"
> >  #include "qapi/qapi-commands-ui.h"
> >  #include "qapi/qmp/qerror.h"
> >  #include "sysemu/iothread.h"
> > @@ -132,10 +133,16 @@ typedef struct BlockdevOptionsQueueEntry {
> >
> >  typedef QSIMPLEQ_HEAD(, BlockdevOptionsQueueEntry) BlockdevOptionsQueue;
> >
> > +typedef struct ObjectOption {
> > +    ObjectOptions *opts;
> > +    QTAILQ_ENTRY(ObjectOption) next;
> > +} ObjectOption;
> > +
>
> The names feel awkward.
>
> ObjectOption represents a -object option.  Fair enough.
>
> ObjectOptions represents the "options" in its option argument.
>
> Confusing.  Calling the whole thing and one of its parts the same is a
> bad idea.
>
> I never liked calling the key=value things in option arguments
> "options".  They aren't CLI options, they are optional CLI option
> parameters.
>
> I also don't like calling so many different things "object" (QObject,
> Object, ObjectOption, ObjectOptions), but that feels out of scope here.
>
> Can we please rename ObjectOptions?
>
> A naming convention for CLI option argument types and boxed QMP command
> argument types would be nice.
>
> [...]
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3397 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-13 10:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-11 17:24 [PATCH 0/3] vl: QAPIfy -object Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-11 17:24 ` [PATCH 1/3] tests: convert check-qom-proplist to keyval Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-11 18:29   ` Eric Blake
2021-03-12 10:21   ` Kevin Wolf
2021-03-11 17:24 ` [PATCH 2/3] qom: move user_creatable_add_opts logic to vl.c and QAPIfy it Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-11 18:37   ` Eric Blake
2021-03-12 10:18   ` Kevin Wolf
2021-03-13  9:35   ` Markus Armbruster
2021-03-13  9:40     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-13 12:32       ` Markus Armbruster
2021-03-13  9:57   ` Markus Armbruster
2021-03-13 10:05     ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2021-03-11 17:24 ` [PATCH 3/3] vl: allow passing JSON to -object Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-11 18:38   ` Eric Blake
2021-03-12 10:21   ` Kevin Wolf
2021-03-13  9:41   ` Markus Armbruster
2021-03-11 17:39 ` [PATCH 0/3] vl: QAPIfy -object no-reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CABgObfZbaqiEeNcm7XrEMAgAzp8_xrROFof3VuUKsfK1CCeTdA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).