From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: use of uninitialized variable involving visit_type_uint32() and friends
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2022 10:07:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABgObfbu3MK6SCNGOFGGHWO72e3dYygUybgyavALKq5_pnWK0A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA-wExOSiuJ5F6nBwWXcWW2c1rqHCfT=JNrdWQ4baqu3Og@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1925 bytes --]
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 7:35 PM Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
wrote:
> Coverity warns about use of uninitialized data in what seems
> to be a common pattern of use of visit_type_uint32() and similar
> functions. Here's an example from target/arm/cpu64.c:
>
> static void cpu_max_set_sve_max_vq(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char
> *name,
> void *opaque, Error **errp)
> {
> ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(obj);
> uint32_t max_vq;
> if (!visit_type_uint32(v, name, &max_vq, errp)) {
> return;
> }
> [code that does something with max_vq here]
> }
>
> This doesn't initialize max_vq, on the apparent assumption
> that visit_type_uint32() will do so. But that function [...]
> reads the value of *obj (the uninitialized max_vq).
>
The visit_type_* functions are written to work for both getters and setters.
For the leaves, that means potentially reading uninitialized data. It is
harmless but very ugly, and with respect to static analysis it was all but
a time bomb, all the time.
The best (but most intrusive) solution would be to add a parameter to all
visit_type_* functions with the expected "direction" of the visit, which
could be checked against v->type.
That is:
bool visit_type_uint32(VisitorType expected_type, Visitor *v, const char
*name, uint32_t *obj,
Error **errp)
{
uint64_t value;
bool ok;
trace_visit_type_uint32(v, name, obj);
assert (v->type == expected_type);
if (expected_type & (VISITOR_INPUT | VISITOR_DEALLOC)) {
value = *obj;
}
ok = visit_type_uintN(v, &value, name, UINT32_MAX, "uint32_t", errp);
assert (ok || expected_type == VISITOR_INPUT);
if (expected_type & VISITOR_OUTPUT) {
*obj = value;
}
return ok;
}
Probably also renaming VISITOR_* to V_* for conciseness. That *should*
quiesce Coverity, and also add some runtime checks.
Paolo
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 5224 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-01 8:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-31 17:35 use of uninitialized variable involving visit_type_uint32() and friends Peter Maydell
2022-03-31 22:27 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2022-04-01 8:07 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2022-04-01 9:15 ` Markus Armbruster
2022-04-01 11:16 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-04-01 13:11 ` Markus Armbruster
2022-04-01 15:46 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-04-04 6:24 ` Markus Armbruster
2022-06-27 13:33 ` Peter Maydell
2022-06-27 15:33 ` Markus Armbruster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CABgObfbu3MK6SCNGOFGGHWO72e3dYygUybgyavALKq5_pnWK0A@mail.gmail.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).