From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Alexander Bulekov <alxndr@bu.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] virtio-net: virtio_net_flush_tx() check for per-queue reset
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 16:41:51 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACGkMEt+GE-HPY8pwHtzcFgP8tiLhqktPomhS+x5SmGZkEwTLA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230130004440-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 1:50 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 11:53:18AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 11:42 AM Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 30 Jan 2023 11:01:40 +0800, Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 3:44 PM Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sun, 29 Jan 2023 14:23:21 +0800, Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 10:52 AM Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Check whether it is per-queue reset state in virtio_net_flush_tx().
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Before per-queue reset, we need to recover async tx resources. At this
> > > > > > > time, virtio_net_flush_tx() is called, but we should not try to send
> > > > > > > new packets, so virtio_net_flush_tx() should check the current
> > > > > > > per-queue reset state.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Fixes: 7dc6be52 ("virtio-net: support queue reset")
> > > > > > > Fixes: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/1451
> > > > > > > Reported-by: Alexander Bulekov <alxndr@bu.edu>
> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
> > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > hw/net/virtio-net.c | 3 ++-
> > > > > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > diff --git a/hw/net/virtio-net.c b/hw/net/virtio-net.c
> > > > > > > index 3ae909041a..fba6451a50 100644
> > > > > > > --- a/hw/net/virtio-net.c
> > > > > > > +++ b/hw/net/virtio-net.c
> > > > > > > @@ -2627,7 +2627,8 @@ static int32_t virtio_net_flush_tx(VirtIONetQueue *q)
> > > > > > > VirtQueueElement *elem;
> > > > > > > int32_t num_packets = 0;
> > > > > > > int queue_index = vq2q(virtio_get_queue_index(q->tx_vq));
> > > > > > > - if (!(vdev->status & VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK)) {
> > > > > > > + if (!(vdev->status & VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK) ||
> > > > > > > + virtio_queue_reset_state(q->tx_vq)) {
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We have other places that check DRIVER_OK do we need to check queue
> > > > > > reset as well?
> > > > >
> > > > > I checked it again. I still think that the location of other checking DRIVER_OK
> > > > > does not need to check the queue reset.
> > > >
> > > > For example, if we don't disable can_receive() when the queue is
> > > > reset, it means rx may go for virtio_net_receive_rcu(). It means the
> > > > Qemu is still trying to process the traffic from the network backend
> > > > like tap which may waste cpu cycles.
> > > >
> > > > I think the correct way is to return false when the queue is reset in
> > > > can_receive(), then the backend poll will be disabled (e.g TAP). When
> > > > the queue is enabled again, qemu_flush_queued_packets() will wake up
> > > > the backend polling.
> > > >
> > > > Having had time to check other places but it would be better to
> > > > mention why it doesn't need a check in the changelog.
> > >
> > >
> > > static bool virtio_net_can_receive(NetClientState *nc)
> > > {
> > > VirtIONet *n = qemu_get_nic_opaque(nc);
> > > VirtIODevice *vdev = VIRTIO_DEVICE(n);
> > > VirtIONetQueue *q = virtio_net_get_subqueue(nc);
> > >
> > > if (!vdev->vm_running) {
> > > return false;
> > > }
> > >
> > > if (nc->queue_index >= n->curr_queue_pairs) {
> > > return false;
> > > }
> > >
> > > if (!virtio_queue_ready(q->rx_vq) ||
> > > !(vdev->status & VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK)) {
> > > return false;
> > > }
> > >
> > > return true;
> > > }
> > >
> > > int virtio_queue_ready(VirtQueue *vq)
> > > {
> > > return vq->vring.avail != 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > >
> > > static void __virtio_queue_reset(VirtIODevice *vdev, uint32_t i)
> > > {
> > > vdev->vq[i].vring.desc = 0;
> > > vdev->vq[i].vring.avail = 0;
> > > vdev->vq[i].vring.used = 0;
> > > vdev->vq[i].last_avail_idx = 0;
> > > vdev->vq[i].shadow_avail_idx = 0;
> > > vdev->vq[i].used_idx = 0;
> > > vdev->vq[i].last_avail_wrap_counter = true;
> > > vdev->vq[i].shadow_avail_wrap_counter = true;
> > > vdev->vq[i].used_wrap_counter = true;
> > > virtio_queue_set_vector(vdev, i, VIRTIO_NO_VECTOR);
> > > vdev->vq[i].signalled_used = 0;
> > > vdev->vq[i].signalled_used_valid = false;
> > > vdev->vq[i].notification = true;
> > > vdev->vq[i].vring.num = vdev->vq[i].vring.num_default;
> > > vdev->vq[i].inuse = 0;
> > > virtio_virtqueue_reset_region_cache(&vdev->vq[i]);
> > > }
> > >
> > > In the implementation of Per-Queue Reset, for RX, we stop RX by setting vdev->vq[i].vring.avail to 0.
> >
> > Ok, but this is kind of fragile (especially when vIOMMU is enabled).
> > I'd add an explicit check for reset there.
>
> It's not great in that spec says avail 0 is actually legal.
> But I don't really want to see more and more checks.
> If we are doing cleanups, the right way is probably a new "live" flag
> that transports can set correctly from the combination of
> DRIVER_OK, desc, kick, queue_enable, queue_reset and so on.
I second this, but for kick, we can only do that unless it is mandated
by the spec (otherwise we may break drivers silently).
Thanks
>
> > (probably on top).
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > > Then callback can_receive will return False.
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > E.g:
> > > > > > virtio_net_can_receive()
> > > > > > virtio_net_tx_{timer|bh}()
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > return num_packets;
> > > > > > > }
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > 2.32.0.3.g01195cf9f
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-30 8:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-29 2:51 [PATCH v1 0/2] virtio: fix for assertion failure: virtio_net_get_subqueue(nc)->async_tx.elem failed Xuan Zhuo
2023-01-29 2:51 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] virtio: struct VirtQueue introduce reset Xuan Zhuo
2023-01-29 7:12 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-01-29 7:15 ` Xuan Zhuo
2023-01-29 7:37 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-01-29 7:39 ` Xuan Zhuo
2023-01-29 2:51 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] virtio-net: virtio_net_flush_tx() check for per-queue reset Xuan Zhuo
2023-01-29 6:23 ` Jason Wang
2023-01-29 7:43 ` Xuan Zhuo
2023-01-30 3:01 ` Jason Wang
2023-01-30 3:38 ` Xuan Zhuo
2023-01-30 3:53 ` Jason Wang
2023-01-30 5:50 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-01-30 8:41 ` Jason Wang [this message]
2023-01-29 7:25 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-01-29 7:28 ` Xuan Zhuo
2023-01-29 8:12 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-01-29 8:23 ` Xuan Zhuo
2023-01-29 11:57 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-01-29 12:03 ` Xuan Zhuo
2023-01-29 12:15 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-01-29 12:28 ` Xuan Zhuo
2023-01-30 2:15 ` Xuan Zhuo
2023-01-30 5:32 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-01-30 7:49 ` Jason Wang
2023-01-30 7:53 ` Xuan Zhuo
2023-01-30 8:40 ` Jason Wang
2023-01-30 10:24 ` Xuan Zhuo
2023-01-31 3:27 ` Jason Wang
2023-01-31 7:17 ` Xuan Zhuo
2023-01-31 7:38 ` Xuan Zhuo
2023-01-29 7:26 ` [PATCH v1 0/2] virtio: fix for assertion failure: virtio_net_get_subqueue(nc)->async_tx.elem failed Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CACGkMEt+GE-HPY8pwHtzcFgP8tiLhqktPomhS+x5SmGZkEwTLA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=alxndr@bu.edu \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).