qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu@oracle.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mst@redhat.com, eperezma@redhat.com,
	 joao.m.martins@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] vhost: Perform memory section dirty scans once per iteration
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 11:22:17 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACGkMEtEtmOZB53xibp5G7ZeVdKpZogEnetfnfj1QCSX-RWY8w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d6c1769c-049e-47a3-8705-bdfe1b2a6fd8@oracle.com>

On Sat, Mar 16, 2024 at 2:45 AM Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu@oracle.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 3/14/2024 9:03 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 5:39 AM Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu@oracle.com> wrote:
> >> On setups with one or more virtio-net devices with vhost on,
> >> dirty tracking iteration increases cost the bigger the number
> >> amount of queues are set up e.g. on idle guests migration the
> >> following is observed with virtio-net with vhost=on:
> >>
> >> 48 queues -> 78.11%  [.] vhost_dev_sync_region.isra.13
> >> 8 queues -> 40.50%   [.] vhost_dev_sync_region.isra.13
> >> 1 queue -> 6.89%     [.] vhost_dev_sync_region.isra.13
> >> 2 devices, 1 queue -> 18.60%  [.] vhost_dev_sync_region.isra.14
> >>
> >> With high memory rates the symptom is lack of convergence as soon
> >> as it has a vhost device with a sufficiently high number of queues,
> >> the sufficient number of vhost devices.
> >>
> >> On every migration iteration (every 100msecs) it will redundantly
> >> query the *shared log* the number of queues configured with vhost
> >> that exist in the guest. For the virtqueue data, this is necessary,
> >> but not for the memory sections which are the same. So essentially
> >> we end up scanning the dirty log too often.
> >>
> >> To fix that, select a vhost device responsible for scanning the
> >> log with regards to memory sections dirty tracking. It is selected
> >> when we enable the logger (during migration) and cleared when we
> >> disable the logger. If the vhost logger device goes away for some
> >> reason, the logger will be re-selected from the rest of vhost
> >> devices.
> >>
> >> After making mem-section logger a singleton instance, constant cost
> >> of 7%-9% (like the 1 queue report) will be seen, no matter how many
> >> queues or how many vhost devices are configured:
> >>
> >> 48 queues -> 8.71%    [.] vhost_dev_sync_region.isra.13
> >> 2 devices, 8 queues -> 7.97%   [.] vhost_dev_sync_region.isra.14
> >>
> >> Co-developed-by: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu@oracle.com>
> >>
> >> ---
> >> v3 -> v4:
> >>    - add comment to clarify effect on cache locality and
> >>      performance
> >>
> >> v2 -> v3:
> >>    - add after-fix benchmark to commit log
> >>    - rename vhost_log_dev_enabled to vhost_dev_should_log
> >>    - remove unneeded comparisons for backend_type
> >>    - use QLIST array instead of single flat list to store vhost
> >>      logger devices
> >>    - simplify logger election logic
> >> ---
> >>   hw/virtio/vhost.c         | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> >>   include/hw/virtio/vhost.h |  1 +
> >>   2 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost.c b/hw/virtio/vhost.c
> >> index 612f4db..58522f1 100644
> >> --- a/hw/virtio/vhost.c
> >> +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost.c
> >> @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
> >>
> >>   static struct vhost_log *vhost_log[VHOST_BACKEND_TYPE_MAX];
> >>   static struct vhost_log *vhost_log_shm[VHOST_BACKEND_TYPE_MAX];
> >> +static QLIST_HEAD(, vhost_dev) vhost_log_devs[VHOST_BACKEND_TYPE_MAX];
> >>
> >>   /* Memslots used by backends that support private memslots (without an fd). */
> >>   static unsigned int used_memslots;
> >> @@ -149,6 +150,47 @@ bool vhost_dev_has_iommu(struct vhost_dev *dev)
> >>       }
> >>   }
> >>
> >> +static inline bool vhost_dev_should_log(struct vhost_dev *dev)
> >> +{
> >> +    assert(dev->vhost_ops);
> >> +    assert(dev->vhost_ops->backend_type > VHOST_BACKEND_TYPE_NONE);
> >> +    assert(dev->vhost_ops->backend_type < VHOST_BACKEND_TYPE_MAX);
> >> +
> >> +    return dev == QLIST_FIRST(&vhost_log_devs[dev->vhost_ops->backend_type]);
> > A dumb question, why not simple check
> >
> > dev->log == vhost_log_shm[dev->vhost_ops->backend_type]
> Because we are not sure if the logger comes from vhost_log_shm[] or
> vhost_log[]. Don't want to complicate the check here by calling into
> vhost_dev_log_is_shared() everytime when the .log_sync() is called.

It has very low overhead, isn't it?

static bool vhost_dev_log_is_shared(struct vhost_dev *dev)
{
    return dev->vhost_ops->vhost_requires_shm_log &&
           dev->vhost_ops->vhost_requires_shm_log(dev);
}

And it helps to simplify the logic.

Thanks

>
> -Siwei
> > ?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
>



  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-18  3:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-14 20:27 [PATCH v4 1/2] vhost: dirty log should be per backend type Si-Wei Liu
2024-03-14 20:27 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] vhost: Perform memory section dirty scans once per iteration Si-Wei Liu
2024-03-15  4:03   ` Jason Wang
2024-03-15 18:44     ` Si-Wei Liu
2024-03-18  3:22       ` Jason Wang [this message]
2024-03-18 22:16         ` Si-Wei Liu
2024-03-20  3:27           ` Jason Wang
2024-03-20 21:02             ` Si-Wei Liu
2024-03-21  3:56               ` Jason Wang
2024-03-21 21:42                 ` Si-Wei Liu
2024-03-22  5:08                   ` Jason Wang
2024-03-22 21:13                     ` Si-Wei Liu
2024-03-25  6:13                       ` Jason Wang
2024-03-25 23:20                         ` [External] : " Si-Wei Liu
2024-03-26  4:36                           ` Jason Wang
2024-03-15  3:50 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] vhost: dirty log should be per backend type Jason Wang
2024-03-15 18:33   ` Si-Wei Liu
2024-03-18  3:20     ` Jason Wang
2024-03-18 22:06       ` Si-Wei Liu
2024-03-20  3:25         ` Jason Wang
2024-03-20 20:29           ` Si-Wei Liu
2024-03-21  3:53             ` Jason Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CACGkMEtEtmOZB53xibp5G7ZeVdKpZogEnetfnfj1QCSX-RWY8w@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
    --cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=si-wei.liu@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).