Re: [kvm-unit-tests v4 00/12] powerpc: updates, P10, PNV support

[Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>]

On Thu, 15 Jun 2023 at 03:02, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed Jun 14, 2023 at 11:09 AM AEST, Joel Stanley wrote:
> > On Thu, 8 Jun 2023 at 07:58, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Posting again, a couple of patches were merged and accounted for review
> > > comments from last time.
> >
> > I saw some failures in the spr tests running on a power9 powernv system:
> >
> > $ TESTNAME=sprs TIMEOUT=90s ACCEL= ./powerpc/run powerpc/sprs.elf -smp
> > 1 |grep FAIL
> > FAIL: WORT      ( 895):    0x00000000c0deba80 <==> 0x0000000000000000
>
> This is just TCG machine? I'm not sure why WORT fails, AFAIKS it's the
> same on POWER8 and doesn't do anything just a simple register. I think
> on real hardware WORT may not have any bits implemented on POWER9
> though.

Yeah, just the TCG machine. Now that you point it out all of the
failures I reported are for ACCEL=<blank>, so they are running in tcg
mode.

run_migration timeout -k 1s --foreground 90s
/usr/bin/qemu-system-ppc64 -nodefaults -machine pseries,accel=tcg
-bios powerpc/boot_rom.bin -display none -serial stdio -kernel
powerpc/sprs.elf -smp 1 -append -w # -initrd /tmp/tmp.61XhbvCGcb


>
> > $ MIGRATION=yes TESTNAME=sprs-migration TIMEOUT=90s ACCEL=
> > ./powerpc/run powerpc/sprs.elf -smp 1 -append '-w' | grep FAIL
> > FAIL: SRR0      (  26):    0xcafefacec0debabc <==> 0x0000000000402244
> > FAIL: SRR1      (  27):    0xc0000006409ebab6 <==> 0x8000000000001001
> > FAIL: CTRL      ( 136):            0x00000000 <==>         0x00008001
> > FAIL: WORT      ( 895):    0x00000000c0deba80 <==> 0x0000000000000000
> > FAIL: PIR       (1023):            0x00000010 <==>         0x00000049
> >
> > Linux 6.2.0-20-generic
> > QEMU emulator version 7.2.0 (Debian 1:7.2+dfsg-5ubuntu2)
> >
> > On a power8 powernv:
> >
> > MIGRATION=yes TESTNAME=sprs-migration TIMEOUT=90s ACCEL= ./powerpc/run
> > powerpc/sprs.elf -smp 1 -append '-w' |grep FAIL
> > FAIL: SRR0      (  26):    0xcafefacec0debabc <==> 0x0000000000402234
> > FAIL: SRR1      (  27):    0xc0000006409ebab6 <==> 0x8000000000001000
> > FAIL: CTRL      ( 136):            0x00000000 <==>         0x00008001
> > FAIL: PIR       (1023):            0x00000060 <==>         0x00000030
>
> Hmm, seems we take some interrupt over migration test that is not
> accounted for (could check the address in SRR0 to see where it is).
> Either need to prevent that interrupt or avoid failing on SRR0/1 on
> this test.
>
> Interesting about CTRL, I wonder if that not migrating correctly.
> PIR looks like a migration issue as well, it can't be changed so
> destination CPU has got a different PIR. I would be inclined to
> leave those as failing to remind us to look into them.
>
> I'll take a look at the others though.
>
> Thanks,
> Nick