From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 2/3] linux-aio: handling -EAGAIN for !s->io_q.plugged case
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 19:49:51 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACVXFVOOctpmf=Haq296oP-N6K9e5YKeJN4xBmTuFDp1jAB=hA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <547318D0.9090400@redhat.com>
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 7:38 PM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 24/11/2014 12:31, Ming Lei wrote:
>> + /* don't submit until next completion for -EAGAIN of non plug case */
>> + if (unlikely(!s->io_q.plugged)) {
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> +
>> /* submit immediately if queue depth is above 2/3 */
>> if (idx > s->io_q.size * 2 / 3) {
>> return ioq_submit(s);
> }
>
> return 0;
>
> so I fail to see why my proposal:
>
>
> /* This is reached in two cases: queue not plugged but io_submit
> * returned -EAGAIN, or queue plugged. In the latter case, start
> * submitting some I/O if the queue is getting too full. In the
> * former case, instead, wait until an I/O operation is completed.
> */
> if (likely(idx <= s->io_q.size * 2 / 3) || unlikely(!s->io_q.plugged) {
> return 0;
> }
>
> return ioq_submit(s);
>
> was wrong. Can you explain?
I didn't say your proposal is wrong, and this patch is correct too
without fat comment.
The difference is only that this patch returns immediately in case
of !s->io_q.plugged after putting the req into io queue.
Thanks,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-24 11:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-24 11:31 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 0/3] linux-aio: fix batch submission Ming Lei
2014-11-24 11:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 1/3] linux-aio: fix submit aio as a batch Ming Lei
2014-11-24 11:39 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-11-24 11:51 ` Ming Lei
2014-11-24 11:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 2/3] linux-aio: handling -EAGAIN for !s->io_q.plugged case Ming Lei
2014-11-24 11:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-11-24 11:49 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2014-11-24 11:54 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-11-24 11:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 3/3] linux-aio: remove 'node' from 'struct qemu_laiocb' Ming Lei
2014-11-24 11:40 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 0/3] linux-aio: fix batch submission Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CACVXFVOOctpmf=Haq296oP-N6K9e5YKeJN4xBmTuFDp1jAB=hA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=ming.lei@canonical.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).