From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32790) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZZgwb-00035P-Ep for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2015 11:05:54 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZZgwV-0006aV-Bn for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2015 11:05:53 -0400 Received: from mail-la0-x22a.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c03::22a]:36858) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZZgwU-0006ZZ-UM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2015 11:05:47 -0400 Received: by lanb10 with SMTP id b10so8780900lan.3 for ; Wed, 09 Sep 2015 08:05:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <55EF3069.3010802@twiddle.net> References: <1441173123-25540-1-git-send-email-rth@twiddle.net> <55EF3069.3010802@twiddle.net> From: Artyom Tarasenko Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 17:05:24 +0200 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 00/20] Do away with TB retranslation List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Richard Henderson Cc: Peter Maydell , Aurelien Jarno , QEMU Developers , Dennis Luehring Hi Richard, On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 9:00 PM, Richard Henderson wrote: > On 09/08/2015 11:56 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: >> My sparc test image (which is just the 32-bit debian from >> Aurelien's website) boots fine even with this patchset... > > Odd, it shouldn't. ;-) > > Anyway, I've just fixed the sparc problem and re-pushed the tree to > > git://github.com/rth7680/qemu.git tcg-search-2 > > for anyone who wants to do any more testing. Great work! Both debian wheezy/sparc and debian sid/sparc64 work. My benchmark (running g++ as described here [1]) shows ~3x speed up factor. Not bad! So, for the sparc64 part, Tested-By: Artyom Tarasenko 1. https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2015-08/msg02220.html -- Regards, Artyom Tarasenko SPARC and PPC PReP under qemu blog: http://tyom.blogspot.com/search/label/qemu