From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49140) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XZmGh-0002PD-Fy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Oct 2014 15:42:33 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XZmGb-00089b-6w for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Oct 2014 15:42:27 -0400 Received: from mail-qa0-f51.google.com ([209.85.216.51]:36828) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XZmGb-00089V-2u for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Oct 2014 15:42:21 -0400 Received: by mail-qa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id k15so2232267qaq.10 for ; Thu, 02 Oct 2014 12:42:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <000101cfde75$27a55400$76effc00$@gmail.com> References: <000101cfde75$27a55400$76effc00$@gmail.com> From: Nikolay Nikolaev Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 22:41:59 +0300 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] WiFi inside VMs? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?UTF-8?B?0JLQsNGB0LjQuyDQoNCw0L3Qs9C10LvQvtCy?= Cc: qemu-devel Hello, On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 10:14 PM, =D0=92=D0=B0=D1=81=D0=B8=D0=BB =D0=A0=D0= =B0=D0=BD=D0=B3=D0=B5=D0=BB=D0=BE=D0=B2 wrote: > Hello. > > I'd like to ask if it would be possible to add support for at least one > model of WiFi device on guest machines? USB and/or PCI passthorugh might help here, or am I getting something wrong= ? > > > I realize the feature request has been discussed previously (here: > http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2007-03/msg00575.html ), = but > my reason for wanting it is slightly different than the reason back then.= .. > > There's this program for simulating networks you've definitely heard of (= I > mean... It's been mentioned on this list...) - GNS3. It currently can't > emulate Wireless networks, exactly because Qemu (nor any other emulator f= or > that matter) supports WiFi devices inside VMs. > > The old discussion above points out how it would be problematic to bridge= a > real WiFi adapter to the virtual one, but as far as GNS3 is concerned, > that's not really a problem, since the backend in its case needs to be a = UDP > tunnel. As long as the WiFi frames can be encapsulated into a UDP tunnel, > GNS3 could theoretically provide the connection between two WiFi devices > inside a simulated topology. > > > Even if such a feature's usefulness is only limited to GNS3, that's still > IMHO a great deal of usefulness, and therefore it should be a worthy goal= to > pursue. > > So... Pleeeease? Pretty please? :-) > > Thanks, > Regards, > Vasil Rangelov > > regards, Nikolay Nikolaev Virtual Open Systems