Re: [PATCH 0/3] Virtio dmabuf improvements

[Albert Esteve <aesteve@redhat.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1574 bytes --]

On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 9:50 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 04:49:35PM +0100, Albert Esteve wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 10:37 AM Albert Esteve <aesteve@redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >     Various improvements for the virtio-dmabuf module.
> >     This patch includes:
> >
> >     - Check for ownership before allowing a vhost device
> >       to remove an object from the table.
> >     - Properly cleanup shared resources if a vhost device
> >       object gets cleaned up.
> >     - Rename virtio dmabuf functions to `virtio_dmabuf_*`
> >
> >     Albert Esteve (3):
> >       hw/virtio: check owner for removing objects
> >       hw/virtio: cleanup shared resources
> >       hw/virtio: rename virtio dmabuf API
> >
> >      hw/display/virtio-dmabuf.c        | 14 +++++-----
> >      hw/virtio/vhost-user.c            | 33 ++++++++++++++++++-----
> >      hw/virtio/vhost.c                 |  5 ++++
> >      include/hw/virtio/vhost.h         |  6 +++++
> >      include/hw/virtio/virtio-dmabuf.h | 33 ++++++++++++-----------
> >      tests/unit/test-virtio-dmabuf.c   | 44
> +++++++++++++++----------------
> >      6 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
> >
> >     --
> >     2.41.0
> >
> >
> >
> > Bump :)
> >
> > @Marc-André Lureau could you please take a look? You suggested the API
> > upgrades, so would be great if you could check if it is what you had in
> mind.
> >
> > Thanks!
>
> All this is post releas material, right?
>
>
Yes, it is.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2339 bytes --]