From: Jason Chien <jason.chien@sifive.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-riscv@nongnu.org,
"Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
"Andrey Smirnov" <andrew.smirnov@gmail.com>,
"Greg Kurz" <groug@kaod.org>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
"Igor Mammedov" <imammedo@redhat.com>,
qemu-arm@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hw/pci-host: Allow extended config space access for Designware PCIe host
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2023 01:46:19 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CADr__8rS7v1v=Nr-OtOkqBEpeK5eCYrym73=eT5JJgi4D6qiYA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230810134315-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3430 bytes --]
the patch
<https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2021-11/msg02162.html> link:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2021-11/msg02162.html
On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 1:44 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 01:22:08AM +0800, Jason Chien wrote:
> > As far as I know, the order issue is caused by nested device
> realization. In
> > this case, realizing TYPE_DESIGNWARE_PCIE_HOST will also
> > realize TYPE_DESIGNWARE_PCIE_ROOT(see designware_pcie_host_realize()).
> > device_set_realized() is the function that realizing a device must go
> through,
> > and this function first realizes the device by dc->realize() and then
> realizes
> > the device's child bus by qbus_realize(). Whether there is any child bus
> of the
> > device may depend on dc->realize(). The realization flow will be like a
> > recursive call to device_set_realized(). More precisely, the flow in
> this case
> > is: qdev_realize() --> ... --> FIRST device_set_realized() --> FIRST dc->
> > realize() --> ... --> designware_pcie_host_realize() --> qdev_realize()
> --> ...
> > --> SECOND device_set_realized() --> SECOND dc->realize() --> ... -->
> > designware_pcie_root_realize() --> ...--> back to the SECOND
> > device_set_realized() --> SECOND qbus_realize() the CHILD bus "dw-pcie"
> --> ...
> > --> back to the FIRST device_set_realized() --> FIRST qbus_realize() the
> PARENT
> > bus "pcie".
> >
> > I also found this patch that solves the same bus issue.
>
> Which patch?
>
> > Do you have any suggestions on the order of realization? Thanks!
>
>
> I see. It's not easy to fix. Worth thinking about but I guess your
> patch is ok for now.
>
> > On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 5:24 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 10:22:50AM +0000, Jason Chien wrote:
> > > In pcie_bus_realize(), a root bus is realized as a PCIe bus and a
> > non-root
> > > bus is realized as a PCIe bus if its parent bus is a PCIe bus.
> However,
> > > the child bus "dw-pcie" is realized before the parent bus "pcie"
> which is
> > > the root PCIe bus. Thus, the extended configuration space is not
> > accessible
> > > on "dw-pcie". The issue can be resolved by adding the
> > > PCI_BUS_EXTENDED_CONFIG_SPACE flag to "pcie" before "dw-pcie" is
> > realized.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jason Chien <jason.chien@sifive.com>
> >
> > I think we should fix the order of initialization rather than
> > hack around it.
> >
> > > ---
> > > hw/pci-host/designware.c | 1 +
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/hw/pci-host/designware.c b/hw/pci-host/designware.c
> > > index 9e183caa48..388d252ee2 100644
> > > --- a/hw/pci-host/designware.c
> > > +++ b/hw/pci-host/designware.c
> > > @@ -694,6 +694,7 @@ static void
> designware_pcie_host_realize(DeviceState
> > *dev, Error **errp)
> > > &s->pci.io,
> > > 0, 4,
> > > TYPE_PCIE_BUS);
> > > + pci->bus->flags |= PCI_BUS_EXTENDED_CONFIG_SPACE;
> > >
> > > memory_region_init(&s->pci.address_space_root,
> > > OBJECT(s),
> > > --
> > > 2.17.1
> >
> >
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4689 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-10 17:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-09 10:22 [PATCH] hw/pci-host: Allow extended config space access for Designware PCIe host Jason Chien
2023-08-09 21:24 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-08-10 17:22 ` Jason Chien
2023-08-10 17:43 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-08-10 17:46 ` Jason Chien [this message]
2023-08-10 17:51 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-08-11 9:55 ` Peter Maydell
2023-08-11 14:06 ` Peter Maydell
2023-08-12 5:37 ` Jason Chien
2023-08-11 6:46 ` Frank Chang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CADr__8rS7v1v=Nr-OtOkqBEpeK5eCYrym73=eT5JJgi4D6qiYA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=jason.chien@sifive.com \
--cc=andrew.smirnov@gmail.com \
--cc=groug@kaod.org \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-riscv@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).