From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D431C433E0 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 10:27:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7DDF64E57 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 10:27:47 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B7DDF64E57 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:58196 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lEUuw-00069u-Lu for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 05:27:46 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37576) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lEUrk-0003M0-Qn; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 05:24:29 -0500 Received: from mail-yb1-xb31.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::b31]:43316) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lEUrd-0001m3-GF; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 05:24:28 -0500 Received: by mail-yb1-xb31.google.com with SMTP id u75so15929477ybi.10; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 02:24:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ucuPs1EFrTWkrcSftLOOH0A/C7Bd9UVGmjlvXJpdG9k=; b=OtLj21otqdt6tM/o4Kn43BNoUe3C0HJ5LdGr48YE3t7zBMTXwQzwCvAobM2G6Ps8on JwalP/g9JbDKC6H3epqCr2K5+KxjsPCf63HDqem1S6xuR4EZ0unurmgGGVLBz1zRqYfo xB6VSDr4q4WSC7WpXoIWha7IvWvYQ5nO63hITDpRB14Mt6F/VLHjfk5l9UPVO1yeufbK Yrv7wbttLRpedeMR6YoKqb4dcf5m0QWkIL/5xKTZSCG2pZrgwcoIAXL1izue1MNB/SIx hDZ/0Krkq/INH6aZEbnu1QpV6KONLrpmQ3BSxXs2EUPIsHj2VY9NsBCL/gVF6/YcMr5+ ddJA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ucuPs1EFrTWkrcSftLOOH0A/C7Bd9UVGmjlvXJpdG9k=; b=Ta2OUpHjdNcwKM6qWMbZQVjIsOSOG9S6HKGSxSHqu1WEpukutq4nnukgORpiRCD3L2 gIqvpZnGtAwifLScxEE/wyeGr6ol6FHWvSnXk5w3YoX853vhTEIbN/MZx023+Heb1ZOf sSTFVyIzvtuE5sEsohb+nQVpUOaBvCt4xXxxWTLu2H6F8JKn+bCkk3GR8es1DEeWnE4I o6V0AN7z9steJEeUUN1kg2+w3/t9aXoVriF2fiCAh2JAPphAk9g5c61SYrVY3esT9iYV H3wUR2DH7bJw6AsNrof7s06KcTXJfbB6VLyEjE/qx8kWEcoUt9AW/SG2y4vPEis4wBG7 fgSQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530F7B9flQYbXmI74Eo7H28Y/NMmo7c8p3S4LmHwB62Tx/YLknW7 WmaiIKMXDOsjPOFv9gXgrA1m2X4b7JVdTlGHgkk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyQGDRTSOap4wZEwpEUXCo3P46OEaOzWRYOnLeU57BN6uXD0fi3wXNxa4K0dw7bHSeKcpPf6wmhvvRx8o4HOCw= X-Received: by 2002:a25:8712:: with SMTP id a18mr38901184ybl.306.1614075858970; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 02:24:18 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <99af17f9-10cf-7c9b-8222-2318b464f5b0@redhat.com> <20210222082137.1b3f8b3b@bahia.lan> <20210222154341.0992238d@bahia.lan> <20210223105510.0687d0b6@bahia.lan> In-Reply-To: <20210223105510.0687d0b6@bahia.lan> From: Bin Meng Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 18:24:07 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: who's using the ozlabs patchwork install for QEMU patches ? To: Greg Kurz Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::b31; envelope-from=bmeng.cn@gmail.com; helo=mail-yb1-xb31.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Peter Maydell , Thomas Huth , Alexey Kardashevskiy , Christian Schoenebeck , QEMU Developers , "qemu-ppc@nongnu.org" , David Gibson Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 5:55 PM Greg Kurz wrote: > > On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 14:57:21 +0800 > Bin Meng wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 10:43 PM Greg Kurz wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 13:59:34 +0000 > > > Peter Maydell wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 at 07:21, Greg Kurz wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 19 Feb 2021 17:51:02 +0100 > > > > > Thomas Huth wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On 19/02/2021 17.26, Peter Maydell wrote: > > > > > > > Does anybody use the ozlabs patchwork install for QEMU patches, > > > > > > > either occasionally or on a regular basis ? > > > > > > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/qemu-devel/list/ > > > > > > > The admins for that system are trying to identify which of > > > > > > > the various projects are really using their patchwork instances, > > > > > > > so I figured I'd do a quick survey here. We don't use it > > > > > > > as an official project tool but it's certainly possible to > > > > > > > use it as an individual developer in one way or another. > > > > > > > > > > > > I think it might be used by some of the ppc hackers ... so CC:-ing to > > > > > > qemu-pcc ... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I do on a very regular basis. > > > > > > > > Thanks for the reports. Do you use the features like assigning > > > > patches to people and changing patch status, or do you mostly > > > > just use it as a read-only archive-of-patches ? > > > > > > > > > > Only the latter but mostly because I don't have the permissions > > > to change status, e.g. when trying to change status of this > > > recent patch from Cedric to rearrange the PowerPC docs: > > > > > > You don't have permissions to edit patch 'docs/system: Extend PPC section' > > > > > > My understanding is that users must be "maintainer" to edit other's > > > patches. Only three 'maintainers' are currently listed at ozlabs for > > > QEMU: > > > > I can update my patch status in the QEMU project. I am not sure if > > this is due to I am a maintainer of another project hosted on > > ozlabs.org. > > > > Yeah everyone can update its own patches but you need to > be maintainer of a project to update the status of other's > patch for this project IIUC. > Ah, I see, thanks. So the question is whether QEMU maintainers want to try the practice of using patchwork to help their maintenance work ... > > > > > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/api/1.0/projects/14/ > > > > > > We had a discussion about that a few months back with Christian Schoenebeck > > > (9pfs maintainer, Cc'd) who also uses patchworks. It turned out we didn't > > > quite know how to go further because of lack of documentation, but I'd be > > > glad to experiment the full patchwork experience if someone knows how to > > > do it :-) > > > > I personally found patchwork is really helpful for mainatiner's work. > > But it looks the maintainers from the QEMU community do not use it. Regards, Bin