From: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
To: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <f4bug@amsat.org>
Cc: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org Developers" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Qemu-block <qemu-block@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] hw/sd: sd: Actually perform the erase operation
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 10:41:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAEUhbmWXdMZhUmH5bhRfQLNDw2G8KeEmfhjfOWSt5u5E7spE2g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1afba402-8a95-db72-6529-0ac40d20b073@amsat.org>
On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 6:28 AM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> wrote:
>
> On 2/16/21 4:02 PM, Bin Meng wrote:
> > From: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
> >
> > At present the sd_erase() does not erase the requested range of card
> > data to 0xFFs. Let's make the erase operation actually happen.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> > - honor the write protection bits for SDSC cards
> >
> > hw/sd/sd.c | 22 ++++++++++++++--------
> > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/sd/sd.c b/hw/sd/sd.c
> > index f1f98bdec3..b386f16fcb 100644
> > --- a/hw/sd/sd.c
> > +++ b/hw/sd/sd.c
> > @@ -766,6 +766,9 @@ static void sd_erase(SDState *sd)
> > uint64_t erase_start = sd->erase_start;
> > uint64_t erase_end = sd->erase_end;
> > bool sdsc = true;
> > + uint64_t wpnum;
> > + uint64_t erase_addr;
> > + int erase_len = 1 << HWBLOCK_SHIFT;
> >
> > trace_sdcard_erase(sd->erase_start, sd->erase_end);
> > if (sd->erase_start == INVALID_ADDRESS
> > @@ -794,17 +797,20 @@ static void sd_erase(SDState *sd)
> > sd->erase_end = INVALID_ADDRESS;
> > sd->csd[14] |= 0x40;
> >
> > - /* Only SDSC cards support write protect groups */
> > - if (sdsc) {
> > - erase_start = sd_addr_to_wpnum(erase_start);
> > - erase_end = sd_addr_to_wpnum(erase_end);
> > -
> > - for (i = erase_start; i <= erase_end; i++) {
> > - assert(i < sd->wpgrps_size);
> > - if (test_bit(i, sd->wp_groups)) {
> > + memset(sd->data, 0xff, erase_len);
> > + erase_addr = erase_start;
> > + for (i = 0; i <= (erase_end - erase_start) / erase_len; i++) {
> > + if (sdsc) {
> > + /* Only SDSC cards support write protect groups */
> > + wpnum = sd_addr_to_wpnum(erase_addr);
> > + assert(wpnum < sd->wpgrps_size);
> > + if (test_bit(wpnum, sd->wp_groups)) {
> > sd->card_status |= WP_ERASE_SKIP;
> > + continue;
>
> So if a group is protected, you skip it but don't increase erase_addr.
> If G#4 is protected and G#5 isn't, when you check G#5 you end erasing
> G#4.
>
Oops, good catch!
I will send v2.
> > }
> > }
> > + BLK_WRITE_BLOCK(erase_addr, erase_len);
> > + erase_addr += erase_len;
> > }
> > }
Regards,
Bin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-20 2:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-16 15:02 [PATCH v2 0/8] hw/sd: sd: Erase operation and other fixes Bin Meng
2021-02-16 15:02 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] hw/sd: sd: Fix address check in sd_erase() Bin Meng
2021-02-16 15:02 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] hw/sd: sd: Only SDSC cards support CMD28/29/30 Bin Meng
2021-02-16 15:32 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-02-16 15:02 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] hw/sd: sd: Fix CMD30 response type Bin Meng
2021-02-19 22:14 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-02-16 15:02 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] hw/sd: sd: Move the sd_block_{read, write} and macros ahead Bin Meng
2021-02-16 15:02 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] hw/sd: sd: Skip write protect groups check in sd_erase() for high capacity cards Bin Meng
2021-02-19 22:30 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-02-16 15:02 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] hw/sd: sd: Actually perform the erase operation Bin Meng
2021-02-19 22:28 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-02-20 2:41 ` Bin Meng [this message]
2021-02-16 15:02 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] hw/sd: sd: Skip write protect groups check in CMD24/25 for high capacity cards Bin Meng
2021-02-19 22:22 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-02-16 15:02 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] hw/sd: sd: Bypass the RCA check for CMD13 in SPI mode Bin Meng
2021-02-16 15:23 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-02-19 22:34 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] hw/sd: sd: Erase operation and other fixes Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAEUhbmWXdMZhUmH5bhRfQLNDw2G8KeEmfhjfOWSt5u5E7spE2g@mail.gmail.com \
--to=bmeng.cn@gmail.com \
--cc=bin.meng@windriver.com \
--cc=f4bug@amsat.org \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).