From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37094) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YmnVF-0003ma-9d for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 14:11:34 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YmnVB-0005n4-2a for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 14:11:33 -0400 Received: from mail-qk0-f172.google.com ([209.85.220.172]:33617) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YmnVA-0005mu-Ux for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 14:11:29 -0400 Received: by qkx62 with SMTP id 62so66931156qkx.0 for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 11:11:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: peter.crosthwaite@petalogix.com In-Reply-To: <1430153133-30988-5-git-send-email-cota@braap.org> References: <1430153133-30988-1-git-send-email-cota@braap.org> <1430153133-30988-5-git-send-email-cota@braap.org> Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 11:11:28 -0700 Message-ID: From: Peter Crosthwaite Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/6] gitignore: ignore *.patch files List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Emilio G. Cota" Cc: qemu-trivial , Michael Tokarev , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org Developers" On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Emilio G. Cota wrote: > Signed-off-by: Emilio G. Cota > --- > .gitignore | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore > index aed0e1f..025a841 100644 > --- a/.gitignore > +++ b/.gitignore > @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ > *.fn > *.ky > *.log > +*.patch This Issue is discussed and I think it was concluded to not gitignore patches. See: commit f3a22014e94dfaacb57277dafce66b41cd994869 Author: Michael Tokarev Date: Thu Jun 6 01:14:54 2013 +0400 gitignore: unignore *.patch This partially reverts: commit 082369e62c5bbaba89f173c2b803bc24115bb111 Author: liguang Date: Fri Mar 22 16:44:13 2013 +0800 gitignore: ignore more files I'm not sure how this went in. The thing is that ignoring *.patch, in my opinion, is just wrong. Especially for downstreams who apply patches for real. Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev Regards, Peter > *.pdf > *.pod > *.cps > -- > 1.9.1 > >