From: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
To: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Cc: "Peter Xu" <peterx@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
"Daniel P . Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
"Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
"Wainer dos Santos Moschetta" <wainersm@redhat.com>,
"Beraldo Leal" <bleal@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ci: migration: Don't run python tests in the compat job
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 20:54:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFEAcA-1SWDYAsz_icPEXGOcbs0N0Aafn9cv69KASK8uPW6OrQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ttetlwsb.fsf@suse.de>
On Thu, 5 Sept 2024 at 20:34, Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de> wrote:
>
> Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> writes:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 05, 2024 at 03:54:45PM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
> >> The vmstate-checker-script test has a bug that makes it flaky. It was
> >> also committed by mistake and will be removed.
> >>
> >> Since the migration-compat job takes the tests from the build-previous
> >> job instead of the current HEAD, neither a fix or a removal of the
> >> test will take effect for this release.
> >>
> >> Disable the faulty/undesirable test by taking advantage that it only
> >> runs if the PYTHON environment variable is set. This also disables the
> >> analyze-migration-script test, but this is fine because that test
> >> doesn't have migration compatibility implications.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> >
> > We should still merge your previous pull, right? Looks like that's the
> > easiest indeed.
>
> As I mentioned there, that pull is not to blame for this situation, so
> my recommendation is to merge. However, there is still the suppression
> of the deprecation messages that Peter asked about. I'll send a series
> for that in a moment, but it requires qtest changes and probably a lot
> of discussion.
Looking at logs for other things I've merged, those deprecation
messages are already upstream. So I'm OK with giving your
pullreq as it stands another attempt at a merge.
thanks
-- PMM
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-05 19:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-05 18:54 [PATCH] ci: migration: Don't run python tests in the compat job Fabiano Rosas
2024-09-05 19:05 ` Thomas Huth
2024-09-05 19:26 ` Peter Xu
2024-09-05 19:21 ` Peter Xu
2024-09-05 19:34 ` Fabiano Rosas
2024-09-05 19:54 ` Peter Maydell [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAFEAcA-1SWDYAsz_icPEXGOcbs0N0Aafn9cv69KASK8uPW6OrQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=bleal@redhat.com \
--cc=farosas@suse.de \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=wainersm@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).