From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59967) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WVlPq-0001WK-3k for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Apr 2014 13:27:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WVlPi-0001b7-Bh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Apr 2014 13:27:01 -0400 Received: from mail-lb0-f169.google.com ([209.85.217.169]:52339) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WVlPi-0001ar-2g for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Apr 2014 13:26:54 -0400 Received: by mail-lb0-f169.google.com with SMTP id q8so1625778lbi.28 for ; Thu, 03 Apr 2014 10:26:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1396543778-22307-6-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> References: <1396543778-22307-1-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <1396543778-22307-6-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> From: Peter Maydell Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 18:26:32 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 05/24] virtio-net: out-of-bounds buffer write on load List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: Michael Roth , qemu-stable , QEMU Developers , Anthony Liguori , Dave Gilbert On 3 April 2014 17:50, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > CVE-2013-4149 QEMU 1.3.0 out-of-bounds buffer write in > virtio_net_load()@hw/net/virtio-net.c > >> } else if (n->mac_table.in_use) { >> uint8_t *buf = g_malloc0(n->mac_table.in_use); > > We are allocating buffer of size n->mac_table.in_use > >> qemu_get_buffer(f, buf, n->mac_table.in_use * ETH_ALEN); > > and read to the n->mac_table.in_use size buffer n->mac_table.in_use * > ETH_ALEN bytes, corrupting memory. > > If adversary controls state then memory written there is controlled > by adversary. > > Reviewed-by: Michael Roth > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin > --- > hw/net/virtio-net.c | 14 ++++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/hw/net/virtio-net.c b/hw/net/virtio-net.c > index 439477b..c247529 100644 > --- a/hw/net/virtio-net.c > +++ b/hw/net/virtio-net.c > @@ -1362,10 +1362,16 @@ static int virtio_net_load(QEMUFile *f, void *opaque, int version_id) > if (n->mac_table.in_use <= MAC_TABLE_ENTRIES) { > qemu_get_buffer(f, n->mac_table.macs, > n->mac_table.in_use * ETH_ALEN); > - } else if (n->mac_table.in_use) { > - uint8_t *buf = g_malloc0(n->mac_table.in_use); > - qemu_get_buffer(f, buf, n->mac_table.in_use * ETH_ALEN); > - g_free(buf); > + } else { > + int i; > + > + /* Overflow detected - can happen if source has a larger MAC table. > + * We simply set overflow flag so there's no need to maintain the > + * table of addresses, discard them all. > + */ > + for (i = 0; i < n->mac_table.in_use * ETH_ALEN; ++i) { > + qemu_get_byte(f); > + } If the incoming data sets the in_use field to INT_MAX then we get integer overflow on the multiply here. That's undefined behaviour in C and we probably shouldn't allow that to happen. thanks -- PMM