From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55379) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YGbCJ-0005br-0H for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 17:34:55 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YGbCF-0003sk-Oi for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 17:34:54 -0500 Received: from mail-lb0-f180.google.com ([209.85.217.180]:38693) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YGbCF-0003sT-Hr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 17:34:51 -0500 Received: by mail-lb0-f180.google.com with SMTP id b6so22086443lbj.11 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 14:34:50 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1422037228-5363-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org> <1422037228-5363-5-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org> From: Peter Maydell Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 22:34:30 +0000 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 04/11] target-arm: Define correct mmu_idx values and pass them in TB flags List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Greg Bellows Cc: "Edgar E. Iglesias" , Andrew Jones , =?UTF-8?B?QWxleCBCZW5uw6ll?= , QEMU Developers , Patch Tracking On 28 January 2015 at 21:57, Greg Bellows wrote: > After getting through patch 9, I wonder if the TB NS bit can also be removed > as it is implied in the MMU index. No, because for a 32-bit EL3 we are always running under a Secure translation regime (S1E3) but the TBFLAG_NS bit may be either 0 or 1 depending on the value of the SCR.NS bit. -- PMM