From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52615) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VYFVp-0001YV-RX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 09:27:18 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VYFVh-0003ar-UR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 09:27:13 -0400 Received: from mail-la0-f46.google.com ([209.85.215.46]:57898) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VYFVh-0003aa-Mc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 09:27:05 -0400 Received: by mail-la0-f46.google.com with SMTP id hp15so942552lab.19 for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 06:27:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56EA75BA695AE044ACFB41322F6D2BF44CCA356C@BADAG01.ba.imgtec.org> References: <1381496638-29127-1-git-send-email-petar.jovanovic@rt-rk.com> <56EA75BA695AE044ACFB41322F6D2BF40224FF76@BADAG02.ba.imgtec.org> <5264E9C3.6090001@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <56EA75BA695AE044ACFB41322F6D2BF44CCA356C@BADAG01.ba.imgtec.org> From: Peter Maydell Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 14:26:44 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH] linux-user: pass correct parameter to do_shmctl() List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Petar Jovanovic Cc: QEMU Trivial , Riku Voipio , Michael Tokarev , Petar Jovanovic , QEMU Developers On 21 October 2013 11:49, Petar Jovanovic wrote: > From: Michael Tokarev [mjt@tls.msk.ru] >> Shouldn't the two patches be applied together and be routed via some >> other, "non-trivial" tree instead? > > This is what I originally did, but Peter suggested to separate it in two patches. > Dividing that patch into two separate patches made this one trivial. I meant, "divide this one patch into two patches and post them as a single patch series [ie a cover letter with patches labelled 1/2 and 2/2, with the correct threading]". This is the standard way to submit changes which are best split into multiple patches/commits for ease of review but which combine to form a single feature/bugfix. These patches should all go via linux-user, yes. thanks -- PMM