From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34514) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c1cqN-0007mD-Uh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 13:27:28 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c1cqN-0000p6-4x for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 13:27:27 -0400 Received: from mail-ua0-x22a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400c:c08::22a]:33817) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c1cqN-0000p2-02 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 13:27:27 -0400 Received: by mail-ua0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id 51so116438728uai.1 for ; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 10:27:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161101192359-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <1477850917-1214-1-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <20161101192359-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> From: Peter Maydell Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 17:27:05 +0000 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 00/47] virtio, pc: fixes and features List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: QEMU Developers On 1 November 2016 at 17:25, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > A general question - I have a couple of tweaks to tests in > my tree. Didn't push to avoid them blocking the features. > I think test tweaks are fair game after freeze - agree? Yes, especially if they're only tweaks, not enormous changes. thanks -- PMM