From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 065CDC64E8A for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 13:32:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 232BA20727 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 13:32:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="X3XgvkxH" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 232BA20727 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:42712 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kjjHp-0002Oj-AJ for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 08:32:13 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34844) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kjjCE-0006hV-9a for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 08:26:26 -0500 Received: from mail-ej1-x62e.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::62e]:41431) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kjjCC-00045k-8R for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 08:26:25 -0500 Received: by mail-ej1-x62e.google.com with SMTP id f23so1791501ejt.8 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 05:26:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=e+NKxKyeoqCIDEDdsuOFhamrjxI2SP9q59L9/qzoO/A=; b=X3XgvkxHaGnwY5wDFTuVjbBurC0VCE6pHKy0dKIQP1X+tdlMyoCe6uzv0ZbVH0p6yp SpUGPtEm7JDKnDVUE+YogBHFaCI5KUcyP2Fnj/VlB8mCncTjUpSePFOo7mlx4gQGIYe/ eegdOKLBsoc9ABuN5TSJB/rlWJ8pCAoislZkr1SW61nQtJ7abkQaLcwQs6tkhcVdTCA0 fUeYLQgzpVyt6HksE6DYu7XpkVEH37yD6XSM1TrKH75K0XT38xbEZPYqvPDOvoZdFpRF GzgDUikfqoTh5sboy+SelPQZ1mVgnH41/J3GjkFb5znktsvlA9haVP/I/KUhRYek8LvG 1YdQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=e+NKxKyeoqCIDEDdsuOFhamrjxI2SP9q59L9/qzoO/A=; b=IsuMNzr/8XcILp79AQbphFpBY2xa/jJJXNgnUS/vi3VFWBVuXUEo32scf415mxzmF+ tbGmCR6T/PdcXq6SDxh8Zolf93FX0KJjMCTJTZ/HQLiipJHSo/3zfKtm15ivrDv9Jg9E awAxoKjwkfYhWlM7fRif6vwgfxX8oEcdawPmWEEte4Fjc30KyQA2PLk2sLSL7trk2gay 326asx9MXpWV7yXtAb2mL3z6zMKfZ8peiqf96YTMBagGg0p+8WnKJ2YshsUaSsIA+EUL 1yDBwLwhTpm9mV5ETxliChLYWkFIwM24PkVtOvf1ITmLw1dR/RpeZ3NI9xBocZHzlNzv AvGQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5338/A6w/Ex3yGSsH0pi9vC592j5S1HRJIBbO0M6Dk+3T0dYMxHW InYONG3bAr06MaBR4AsZnTAJOXnUmzWg+S8Ic9v+zQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJysubEEd2miN6LQyJ8fw7dybpWKU6oBCCRbBln1S1qcUp5wxvH8ICq/Ws6i2Le9Fjm3Dr7qG891QhRJSmsL6TQ= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:31d2:: with SMTP id f18mr3767664ejf.407.1606742782667; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 05:26:22 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20201105154208.12442-1-ganqixin@huawei.com> <87d00qk51l.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> <37c519e4-d72b-944c-ed70-038f9c606be9@redhat.com> <87zh3ufoy4.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> <87mtzqsy2r.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> In-Reply-To: <87mtzqsy2r.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> From: Peter Maydell Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 13:26:11 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] scripts/checkpatch.pl: Modify the line length limit of the code To: Markus Armbruster Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::62e; envelope-from=peter.maydell@linaro.org; helo=mail-ej1-x62e.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "Daniel P. Berrange" , zhanghailiang , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , QEMU Trivial , QEMU Developers , Gan Qixin , Paolo Bonzini , "Chenqun \(kuhn\)" , =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu=2DDaud=C3=A9?= Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 at 09:01, Markus Armbruster wrote: > CODING_STYLE.rst: "Lines should be 80 characters; try not to make them > longer." I'd like to keep the tooling we have to help us with trying > not to make them longer. > > If we have lost the ability to differentiate between "warning" and > "error", call it something else. Personally I just want checkpatch with its default arguments not to complain about code that we'd be happy to accept in the tree. It's unnecessary noise when I write and check the code locally, when patchew runs on the patch on the list and then when it goes into a pullreq. Do we need a new "be really strict" option? thanks -- PMM