From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56675) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YXs19-0005DG-Rr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 09:58:48 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YXs14-0004Yf-6a for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 09:58:47 -0400 Received: from mail-ie0-f181.google.com ([209.85.223.181]:35610) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YXs14-0004Yb-1w for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 09:58:42 -0400 Received: by ieclw3 with SMTP id lw3so10362534iec.2 for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 06:58:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20150317135502.GG6540@redhat.com> References: <5507FBD1.4070603@windriver.com> <20150317135502.GG6540@redhat.com> From: Peter Maydell Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 13:58:20 +0000 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] did qemu-user mode support systemd List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Daniel P. Berrange" Cc: fupan , QEMU Developers On 17 March 2015 at 13:55, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 01:50:37PM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote: >> 355 is signalfd4, which we don't currently implement. >> A well designed userspace program will gracefully fall >> back to some other implementation if it tries a newer >> syscall but it doesn't exist. > > systemd devs made an explicit decision to assume they have access to > the level of functionality provided in Linux >= 3.7. So if we want > QEMU user mode to support systemd, then at some point we'll need to > implement signalfd4 support. Patches welcome :-) -- PMM