From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50848) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cZFAx-00029f-BU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2017 06:03:44 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cZFAw-0004gx-DU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2017 06:03:39 -0500 Received: from mail-ua0-x22e.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400c:c08::22e]:35025) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cZFAw-0004gd-9K for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2017 06:03:38 -0500 Received: by mail-ua0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id y9so8595950uae.2 for ; Thu, 02 Feb 2017 03:03:38 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20170131162122.29408-1-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> <3fdd19c5-2017-7c5d-22ad-a44bd15414d6@redhat.com> From: Peter Maydell Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2017 11:03:17 +0000 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 00/41] Chr split patches List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?UTF-8?B?TWFyYy1BbmRyw6kgTHVyZWF1?= Cc: Eric Blake , QEMU Developers On 31 January 2017 at 19:37, Marc-Andr=C3=A9 Lureau wrote: > Hi > > On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 11:00 PM Eric Blake wrote: >> >> On 01/31/2017 12:55 PM, Marc-Andr=C3=A9 Lureau wrote: >> >> >> 'make check' fails on a linux-user-targets-only build: >> >> >> >> tests/test-char.o: In function `char_stdio_test_subprocess': >> >> /home/petmay01/linaro/qemu-for-merges/tests/test-char.c:47: undefined >> >> reference to `qemu_chr_new' >> >> /home/petmay01/linaro/qemu-for-merges/tests/test-char.c:50: undefined >> >> reference to `qemu_chr_fe_init' >> >> /home/petmay01/linaro/qemu-for-merges/tests/test-char.c:51: undefined >> >> reference to `qemu_chr_fe_set_open' >> >> /home/petmay01/linaro/qemu-for-merges/tests/test-char.c:52: undefined >> >> reference to `qemu_chr_fe_write' >> >> [etc etc etc] >> >> >> >> >> > Oh good catch. We want to have chardev-obj-y defined globally, but onl= y >> > linked with -softmmu target. >> > >> > A possible fix to squash with chardev-obj-j patch is: >> > >> > Eric, do you want me to resend the patch for review or is that enough >> > for >> > you to ack? >> > >> >> I'm okay ack'ing the interdiff (that is, squash this in, and you can >> keep the R-b you already have). >> > > Thanks, patch updated, tag updated. > > Peter, let me know if you want me to resend the pull request. Now applied, thanks. -- PMM