From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42028) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ayJ5L-0006f0-5M for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 May 2016 09:13:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ayJ52-000845-PO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 May 2016 09:12:49 -0400 Received: from mail-vk0-x22b.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22b]:34949) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ayJ51-0007x3-IH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 May 2016 09:12:36 -0400 Received: by mail-vk0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id c189so24551145vkb.2 for ; Thu, 05 May 2016 06:12:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160426112148.oyr4imw6ac2syxkv@hawk.localdomain> References: <1461667229-9216-1-git-send-email-zhaoshenglong@huawei.com> <20160426112148.oyr4imw6ac2syxkv@hawk.localdomain> From: Peter Maydell Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 14:11:54 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 0/5] ARM: Add NUMA support for machine virt List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Andrew Jones Cc: Shannon Zhao , qemu-arm , "Huangpeng (Peter)" , Shannon Zhao , QEMU Developers , david.daney@cavium.com On 26 April 2016 at 12:21, Andrew Jones wrote: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 06:40:24PM +0800, Shannon Zhao wrote: >> From: Shannon Zhao >> >> Add NUMA support for machine virt. Tested successfully running a guest >> Linux kernel with the following patch applied: >> >> - [PATCH v16 0/6] arm64, numa: Add numa support for arm64 platforms >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/4/8/571 >> - [PATCH v5 00/14] ACPI NUMA support for ARM64 >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/4/19/852 > > This series looks good to me, but I guess we still need to wait > for the DT spec[*] to be merged first. Hopefully that'll happen > around the time that the 2.7 dev window opens. I'm going to put this series into target-arm.next now, really just so I can get it off my to-review list. I think the DT spec being in the for-next branch is a reasonable implication that it's stable, and in the worst case that we need to make fixups we have plenty of time before our next QEMU release to do them in. Please let me know if any spec change does happen before the DT hits mainline... thanks -- PMM