From: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
To: Jiahuan Zhang <jiahuanzhang90@gmail.com>
Cc: QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Hight Processor time of Socket communciation
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 10:15:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFEAcA-f1P4OW+DwLRn1AZQCzoiWNX_8Rhq0oduppMOSLWo9Ww@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJy91Ca2FTvBzd2OqQZyEJBtCAxxosdcAFP1RMgGCQe2PJXEJA@mail.gmail.com>
On 19 April 2017 at 09:56, Jiahuan Zhang <jiahuanzhang90@gmail.com> wrote:
> Do you mean that it is reasonable for QEMU emulation consumes high CPU time
> when doing host-guest interaction, since the interaction calls many QEMU
> codes in the background?
> Since my guest app is rather simple and no while() is included, according to
> your words,
> can I conclude that the high processor time is cause by the callbacks for
> guest to host data transfer?
What is happening is that the guest kernel's serial driver
has a loop that (simplified) looks like this:
do {
if (pl011_read(REG_FR) & FR_TXFF)
break; /* fifo full, try again later */
pl011_write(buffer[x], REG_DR); /* send one byte */
x++;
} while (x != len);
This is a lot of guest CPU instructions (and two callouts
to QEMU's device emulation) for every single byte.
>> You will likely get better throughput if you use the 'virt' board
>> where you can use the virtio-serial device which can send
>> data more efficiently.
> Here, can I understand your statement in this way,
> a transmit buffer in the serial device for guest to host data transfer
> may reduce the processor time, and in turn, increase the throughput?
The reason virtio-serial is faster is because the guest
kernel driver can essentially tell QEMU
"the data is in guest memory at address X length L"
and then QEMU takes all that data at once. This is much
more efficient.
thanks
-- PMM
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-19 9:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-18 16:19 [Qemu-devel] Hight Processor time of Socket communciation Jiahuan Zhang
2017-04-18 16:26 ` Peter Maydell
2017-04-19 8:56 ` Jiahuan Zhang
2017-04-19 9:15 ` Peter Maydell [this message]
2017-04-19 9:25 ` Jiahuan Zhang
2017-04-19 9:55 ` Peter Maydell
2017-04-19 10:04 ` Jiahuan Zhang
2017-04-19 10:09 ` Peter Maydell
2017-04-19 13:34 ` Jiahuan Zhang
2017-04-19 20:03 ` Peter Maydell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAFEAcA-f1P4OW+DwLRn1AZQCzoiWNX_8Rhq0oduppMOSLWo9Ww@mail.gmail.com \
--to=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=jiahuanzhang90@gmail.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).