From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54066)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <peter.maydell@linaro.org>) id 1WuV2C-0000sm-6n
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 19:00:58 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <peter.maydell@linaro.org>) id 1WuV26-0001Ea-13
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 19:00:52 -0400
Received: from mail-lb0-f172.google.com ([209.85.217.172]:58852)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <peter.maydell@linaro.org>) id 1WuV25-0001EU-QS
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 19:00:45 -0400
Received: by mail-lb0-f172.google.com with SMTP id c11so56430lbj.3
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 16:00:44 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1402246651-71099-11-git-send-email-sbruno@freebsd.org>
References: <1402246651-71099-1-git-send-email-sbruno@freebsd.org>
	<1402246651-71099-11-git-send-email-sbruno@freebsd.org>
From: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 00:00:22 +0100
Message-ID: <CAFEAcA-mXEjiEJOrjJibc-DecVp1QGY2HrQLd6DSZyzDaHAK4A@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 10/10 v4] bsd-user: Add TARGET_HW_MACHINE
 TARGET_HW_MACHINE_ARCH for future use
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Sean Bruno <sbruno@freebsd.org>
Cc: QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

On 8 June 2014 17:57, Sean Bruno <sbruno@freebsd.org> wrote:

"for future use" implies it should go in the patch (or at least the
same patch series) as the code that uses these new defines :-)

thanks
-- PMM