From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55580) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bbqpO-0002L3-Ao for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 11:08:00 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bbqpM-0004Gv-Fm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 11:07:53 -0400 Received: from mail-ua0-x232.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400c:c08::232]:35604) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bbqpL-0004Gi-Uj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 11:07:52 -0400 Received: by mail-ua0-x232.google.com with SMTP id n59so193726479uan.2 for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 08:07:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160822175343-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <1470892391-4917-1-git-send-email-ppandit@redhat.com> <20160819183717.4de8c99d@bahia.lan> <20160819193042.215616b5@bahia.lan> <20160822175343-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> From: Peter Maydell Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 16:07:30 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] 9pfs: add check for relative path List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: Greg Kurz , P J P , Qemu Developers , Prasad J Pandit , Felix Wilhelm , "Aneesh Kumar K.V" On 22 August 2016 at 16:02, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 10:23:19AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: >> On 19 August 2016 at 18:30, Greg Kurz wrote: >> > Maybe the check can even be made in the top layer then. I should spend >> > more time to see which is best. >> > >> > My main concern now is that, unlike I said on IRC, I'm afraid I won't be >> > able to work on this before next Wednesday... :-\ >> > >> > Hope it is not too late for 2.7... >> >> Opinions welcome on whether we need to hold 2.7 for this bug. >> >> thanks >> -- PMM > > Not really sure, but balloon migration seems borken too, > and I'm trying to fix it up. I've tagged rc4 this afternoon, so we have a few days to sort out non-rushed fixes for both this and your bug if necessary, and decide whether we need an rc5 or can postpone the fixes to 2.7.1. In both cases getting patches on-list by midweek or thereabouts would be good. thanks -- PMM