From: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
To: Raphael Poggi <raphael.poggi@lynxleap.co.uk>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, luc@lmichel.fr, damien.hedde@dahe.fr,
philmd@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hw/core/clock: remove assert in clock_propagate
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 20:10:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFEAcA-w32We8F-EEMWt1=aXnDFiDK9qKfub-5Egpzn68q4Htg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240419162951.23558-1-raphael.poggi@lynxleap.co.uk>
On Fri, 19 Apr 2024 at 17:30, Raphael Poggi
<raphael.poggi@lynxleap.co.uk> wrote:
>
> This commit allows childs clock to propagate their new frequency,
> for example, after setting a new multiplier/diviser.
>
> Signed-off-by: Raphael Poggi <raphael.poggi@lynxleap.co.uk>
Applied to target-arm.next, thanks. I rewrote the commit message
to document the conversation we had in the other email thread:
hw/core/clock: allow clock_propagate on child clocks
clock_propagate() has an assert that clk->source is NULL, i.e. that
you are calling it on a clock which has no source clock. This made
sense in the original design where the only way for a clock's
frequency to change if it had a source clock was when that source
clock changed. However, we subsequently added multiplier/divider
support, but didn't look at what that meant for propagation.
If a clock-management device changes the multiplier or divider value
on a clock, it needs to propagate that change down to child clocks,
even if the clock has a source clock set. So the assertion is now
incorrect.
Remove the assertion.
-- PMM
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-25 19:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-19 16:29 [PATCH] hw/core/clock: remove assert in clock_propagate Raphael Poggi
2024-04-25 19:10 ` Peter Maydell [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAFEAcA-w32We8F-EEMWt1=aXnDFiDK9qKfub-5Egpzn68q4Htg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=damien.hedde@dahe.fr \
--cc=luc@lmichel.fr \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=raphael.poggi@lynxleap.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).