qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	qemu devel list <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	"Jordan Justen (Intel address)" <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] why restrict pull reqs to signed tags?
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 19:44:24 +0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFEAcA-yZg+YYTENcN6t2YJ_vomp9Nve2ax8YHbaFpidh-a5kg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu9jrUyx8F45R7cxywF4u0_sok4hSHH=p7KbK5xmXg2Akg@mail.gmail.com>

On 9 March 2016 at 19:40, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> wrote:
> Laszlo is going to shoot me for saying this, but as a compromise
> between the Windows crowd in the Intel firmware team and the more
> Linux/open source oriented people on the opposite side, using github
> does not sound like an entirely unreasonable compromise. At least it
> means no emails anymore with garbled patches and 300 character lines
> in the commit log

By the way, why are you all discussing the EDK2 patch workflow
proposals on qemu-devel and not on an EDK mailing list?

thanks
-- PMM

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-09 12:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-09 10:20 [Qemu-devel] why restrict pull reqs to signed tags? Laszlo Ersek
2016-03-09 11:33 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-09 11:35 ` Peter Maydell
2016-03-09 12:13   ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-03-09 12:19     ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-09 12:31       ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-03-09 12:33         ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-09 12:38         ` David Woodhouse
2016-03-09 12:40           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-03-09 12:44             ` Peter Maydell [this message]
2016-03-09 13:14               ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-03-09 12:34     ` David Woodhouse
2016-03-09 12:42       ` Peter Maydell
2016-03-09 13:09         ` David Woodhouse
2016-03-09 13:27           ` Peter Maydell
2016-03-09 14:13             ` David Woodhouse
2016-03-09 14:41               ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-03-10  8:21                 ` David Woodhouse
2016-03-10  8:52                   ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-10 10:34                     ` David Woodhouse
2016-03-10 12:38                       ` Laszlo Ersek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAFEAcA-yZg+YYTENcN6t2YJ_vomp9Nve2ax8YHbaFpidh-a5kg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=jordan.l.justen@intel.com \
    --cc=lersek@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).