From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37309) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1addTp-00085z-90 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 07:44:46 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1addTo-0006h7-CW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 07:44:45 -0500 Received: from mail-vk0-x22d.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22d]:34950) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1addTo-0006h2-7v for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 07:44:44 -0500 Received: by mail-vk0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id e6so53743875vkh.2 for ; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 04:44:44 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <56DFF8DA.2070408@redhat.com> <56E0136E.8050709@redhat.com> <56E014BF.7060507@redhat.com> <56E017AF.2090107@redhat.com> <1457527086.118898.240.camel@infradead.org> From: Peter Maydell Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 19:44:24 +0700 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] why restrict pull reqs to signed tags? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Ard Biesheuvel Cc: Laszlo Ersek , David Woodhouse , qemu devel list , "Jordan Justen (Intel address)" , Paolo Bonzini On 9 March 2016 at 19:40, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > Laszlo is going to shoot me for saying this, but as a compromise > between the Windows crowd in the Intel firmware team and the more > Linux/open source oriented people on the opposite side, using github > does not sound like an entirely unreasonable compromise. At least it > means no emails anymore with garbled patches and 300 character lines > in the commit log By the way, why are you all discussing the EDK2 patch workflow proposals on qemu-devel and not on an EDK mailing list? thanks -- PMM