From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34685) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dKhA3-0003ba-K5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 04:26:52 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dKhA2-0001TS-S6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 04:26:51 -0400 Received: from mail-wr0-x233.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c0c::233]:35309) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dKhA2-0001TA-JK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 04:26:50 -0400 Received: by mail-wr0-x233.google.com with SMTP id q97so131366805wrb.2 for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 01:26:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4a61a587-6dff-e5fd-58aa-fd168e27f876@redhat.com> References: <20170608070716.2954-1-kraxel@redhat.com> <4a61a587-6dff-e5fd-58aa-fd168e27f876@redhat.com> From: Peter Maydell Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 09:26:28 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/7] ui patch queue List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Thomas Huth Cc: Gerd Hoffmann , QEMU Developers On 13 June 2017 at 06:14, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 12.06.2017 20:08, Peter Maydell wrote: >> On 12 June 2017 at 19:00, Peter Maydell wrote: >>> This causes configure to barf warnings in my build logs on half >>> my build machines: >>> >>> WARNING: Support for gtk2 will be dropped in future releases. >>> WARNING: Please consider using gtk3 instead. >>> >>> I don't think it is yet possible to drop gtk2. >> >> Oh, one of them was the warning about SDL1.2. > > Adding the warning does not necessarily mean that we've really got to > drop support for these in the very near future, but it's a good start to > remind people that support for the old versions won't be around forever > ;-) And AFAIK the old versions of these libraries are not maintained by > the upstream projects anymore, too, so at one point in time, we've > really got to deprecate support for these in QEMU, too. > > So would it at least be feasible to install SDL 2 on that build > machines? (IMHO installing SDL 2 from sources is not too much of a pain, > e.g. it does not require lots of other additional libraries around) Yes, I'll circle back and have a look at whether it's just a matter of installing an extra -dev package. If it's necessary to build from source then it's definitely too early to deprecate though. (Mostly if I have a long pullreq queue than printing warning messages in my build logs is a good way to get your pull request pushed to the end of the todo list :-)) thanks -- PMM