From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39549) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TtGbE-0007R1-Ky for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 06:47:10 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TtGbD-0007Mc-IW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 06:47:08 -0500 Received: from mail-la0-f44.google.com ([209.85.215.44]:47012) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TtGbD-0007MK-BH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 06:47:07 -0500 Received: by mail-la0-f44.google.com with SMTP id fr10so454687lab.31 for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 03:47:05 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <50ED3971.5030600@redhat.com> References: <1355761490-10073-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <877gnovmgj.fsf@codemonkey.ws> <50ED3971.5030600@redhat.com> From: Peter Maydell Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 11:46:45 +0000 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/15] qdev: make reset semantics more clear and consistent, reset qbuses under virtio devices List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Anthony Liguori , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_F=C3=A4rber?= , mst@redhat.com On 9 January 2013 09:33, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > It's possible. I'll move the SCSI bus away from qdev reset. > Anthony/Michael, can you help doing the same with PCIDevice? And > perhaps Peter and Andreas with sysbus? What does it even mean to reset a sysbus? Do we do it anywhere? (it looks like vl.c does, just as a shortcut so memory mapped devices get their reset hooks called?) -- PMM