From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49364) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bsW1J-0002nv-98 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2016 10:21:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bsW1H-00029m-7v for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2016 10:21:04 -0400 Received: from mail-vk0-x233.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400c:c05::233]:35725) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bsW1H-00029c-45 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2016 10:21:03 -0400 Received: by mail-vk0-x233.google.com with SMTP id 192so46682757vkl.2 for ; Fri, 07 Oct 2016 07:21:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1466528974-12183-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org> From: Peter Maydell Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 15:20:42 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Fw: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH v2 0/6] Runtime pagesize computation List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Vijay Kilari Cc: "Kumar, Vijaya" , Patch Tracking , Paolo Bonzini , qemu-arm , QEMU Developers , "prasun.kapoor" On 19 July 2016 at 12:04, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 19 July 2016 at 12:01, Vijay Kilari wrote: >> Hi Peter, >> >> Any update on this patch set. Is it merged? > > No. It's an RFC patchset really, and it was posted during softfreeze, > so I never expected or intended it to be merged before the 2.7 > release. It also needs a respin to address some of the review comments > I got on it. > > What would be useful in getting it further forward would be > some good performance benchmarking of more than just migration. > In particular whether it improves the speed in TCG emulation > mode of aarch64 guests and whether that assert in the definition > of TARGET_PAGE_BITS is particularly performance-draining. If I do a respin of this patchset is anybody willing to do the actual perf benchmarking of the TCG emulation? Otherwise this is unlikely to go into 2.8. thanks -- PMM