From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44061) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XtdEx-00085Q-QE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 26 Nov 2014 09:06:48 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XtdEp-0006pq-03 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 26 Nov 2014 09:06:43 -0500 Received: from mail-la0-f52.google.com ([209.85.215.52]:61207) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XtdEo-0006pm-Q9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 26 Nov 2014 09:06:34 -0500 Received: by mail-la0-f52.google.com with SMTP id q1so2464923lam.25 for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2014 06:06:34 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: From: Peter Maydell Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 14:06:13 +0000 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] TCG Multithreading performance improvement List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Mark Burton Cc: Paolo Bonzini , qemu-devel , Pavel Dovgaluk , Alexander Graf On 26 November 2014 at 09:31, Mark Burton wrote: > We have set up a wiki page to track the project > http://wiki.qemu.org/Features/tcg-multithread I see you write "The TCG today is close to being thread safe". Personally I would phrase this as "TCG today is not at all thread safe" :-) -- PMM