From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36218) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dNiVH-0002JK-Mj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 12:29:16 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dNiVG-00065U-PD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 12:29:15 -0400 Received: from mail-wr0-x22b.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c0c::22b]:35615) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dNiVG-00064R-Iz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 12:29:14 -0400 Received: by mail-wr0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id y25so102674210wrd.2 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 09:29:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <0F376E9C-2D4B-4D79-B3D4-24F73FD61446@gmail.com> <20170508221304.y36owezwla7sc6ss@aurel32.net> <20170508225007.2duqxlo5ab2aenpl@aurel32.net> From: Peter Maydell Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 17:28:52 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] Floating point unit bugs List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: G 3 Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu=2DDaud=C3=A9?= , BALATON Zoltan , "qemu-ppc@nongnu.org list:PowerPC" , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org qemu-devel" , Aurelien Jarno On 21 June 2017 at 17:27, G 3 wrote: > On Jun 21, 2017, at 12:20 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: >> We don't yet have any mechanism for having tests that need to >> be compiled for the target architecture, do we? > > > I don't know about that but I do know we have image files that can be booted > in various guest. These image files could include tests like the floating > point test. > > Here is the link to the test images page: > http://wiki.qemu.org/Testing/System_Images Yes -- those are almost all very out of date, not reproducible at all and don't cover very many of our systems, because we don't have a good mechanism for writing tests that need to be built for the target architecture. I'd like us to have a setup so that it's easy to say "just add a new test", rather than accumulating more random images on the wiki... thanks -- PMM